My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL PACKET 09162003
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2003
>
PL PACKET 09162003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:43:57 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:43:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
27
SP Folder Name
PL PACKETS 2000-2004
SP Name
PL PACKET 09162003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 2 -St. Anthony Shopping Center Sign Plan Amendment <br /> In July, the petitioner outlined the following criteria for the proposed comprehensive sign <br /> plan amendment: <br /> 1) The signage is substantial conformance with Tenant's internal sign criteria and <br /> specifications. <br /> 2) The total width of the sign shall not exceed 80 percent of the Tenant's storefront <br /> width. <br /> 3) The sign height shall be a minimum of 16 inches and maximum or 40 inches. <br /> 4) Sign color or colors are those found on typical retail signage in the <br /> Minneapolis/St. Paul area. <br /> 5) Tenant submits two drawings for Lessor's written approval prior to fabrication of <br /> signs. <br /> 6) Lessor approves Tenant's sign contractor. <br /> The question at this point is how to work in the individual nuances with criteria, such as <br /> stated above, to cover the two new tenants, Subway and Bumper to Bumper, with <br /> possible future tenants in a comprehensive sign plan amendment. <br /> Staff Recommendation: <br /> Staff recommends the Planning Commission work with the St. Anthony Shopping Center <br /> owner to come up with a compromise sign plan amendment for the City Council to <br /> consider at its September 23 meeting. <br /> Attachment: <br /> • Excerpts (pp. 2-4) from the 8/26/03 City Council meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.