Laserfiche WebLink
1 Agenda Copy of February 3rd notice and list of mailings; <br /> 2 Documenta- pertinent pages of Commission' s October 21 , 1986 <br /> 3 tion minutes; <br /> 4 rough draft of Secretary' s attempt at near verbatim <br /> 5 transcript of that meeting; <br /> 6 pertinent sections of the July 21 , 1987 Commission min- <br /> 7 utes airing the Commission' s concerns about the non- <br /> 8 conforming signage which was erected on the store after <br /> 9 it was completely rebuilt; <br /> 10 copies of the September 2 , 1986 elevations for the <br /> 11 remodeled Dairy Queen submitted to staff at the time <br /> 12 of construction; <br /> 13 City Manager ' s February 12th memorandum where he <br /> 14 attempted to, summarize the issues which had arisen <br /> 15 since the Council had first approved the drive-through <br /> 16 facility for the store, which to the City' s surprise <br /> 17 had been completely leveled and rebuilt with signage <br /> 18 far in excess of what the Commission or Council expect- <br /> 19 ed or the Ordinance allowed; <br /> 20 report in -the same memorandum of the applicant' s fail- <br /> 21 ure to come in for a variance to allow that excess , in <br /> 22 spite of numerous letters explaining the necessity for <br /> 023 doing so; <br /> 24 January 4 , 1988 Petition for Sign Variance. <br /> 25 Staff report: Childs recalled it had been during the July 21 , 1987 <br /> 26 Commission discussion with Mr. Plaisted that the <br /> 27 Dairy Queen owner had been told a variance was neces- <br /> 28 sary for him to keep the signage he had put up on his <br /> 29 building but he could expect the Commissioners to look <br /> 30 favorably on that variance when he applied for it; <br /> 31 reported that in spite of several letters from the City <br /> 32 urging application for the variance, the application in <br /> 33 the agenda packet that evening was finally the response <br /> 34 to those letters; <br /> 35 explained that technically the signage on the build- <br /> 36 ing might also be considered to be 5 separate signs <br /> 37 because of the 5 foot separation between the Dairy <br /> 38 Queen logos and the name lettering; <br /> 39 said the Commission could interpret that there were <br /> 40 only 2 signs on the north and south side of the build- <br /> 41 ing which, with the 48 square foot rotating roof sign, <br /> 42 <br /> • 4 <br />