CC MINUTES 08261980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-F- • RESOLUTION 80-057 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZ.ING. THE MAYOR AND CITY' MANAGER TO' EXECUTE. THE. SECOND AMEND- MENT TO AGREEMENT NO. 80228 Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Fornell had recommended the-Council adopt the. -resolution which regulates the use of liquors in the City parks for the interim during .which a. new ordinance..can_.-be. developed by the'..City Attorney for the same purpose: Councilman:. Marks. said,.he..could: not , support the resolution .because of the conflict he perceived- between the City' s. permitting the- use. of: liquor--on, .one hand and on the ,other supporting the efforts of the ..Chemical Abuse Information Committee to combat the use of- the same beverages... The Manager disagreed with the assumption' that .the City would..be condoning .the consumption of liquor.,but rather saw the .resolution as. providing.. the tools by which the City may control . liquor usage- in the parks . It-.was also agreed that the Council will continuelto-. grant permits for liquor usage in the parks. Motion by Mayor Pro. Tem Sundland and. seconded- by Councilman .Letourneau to adopt Resolution 80-058. as submitted and to direct the City staff to incorporatethe same controls into the.. ordinance .designed to regulate liquor usage in the City parks- proposed..by the City Attorney. • RESOLUTION 80-058 A RESOLUTION REGULATING. THE USE OF LIQUORS , INCLUDING.- NON-INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR (3.. 2 BEER)., IN CITY PARKS Voting on the motion: Aye: . - Sundland and Letourneau. Nay: Marks. Motion carried. The Manager had .concluded in. his July 30th..memo that the City had no alternative but- to drop the issue of whether the property -at 2505 27th Avenue N.E. could continue as a duplex since no evidence had materialized to indicate the property usage had ever been other than as a duplex and the owner' s attorney had instead presented information which seems to prove "the property is probably a valid non-conforming use as a two family dwelling" . The former City Assessor had also confirmed that he could remember. no time when the property had not been used as a duplex, and there are no county homestead records • available to- prove otherwise.