Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> April 28 , 1981 <br /> The meeting was called to order by Mayor Haik at 7 :33 P.M. <br /> Present for roll call : Marks, Sundland, Haik, Ranallo and Letourneau. <br /> Also present: Larry Hamer, Acting City Manager; Ron Berg, Administra- <br /> tive Assistant; William Soth, City Attorney; Carol <br /> Johnson, Clerk/Treasurer and Lee Entner , Fire Chief. <br /> Motion by Councilman Sundland and seconded. by Councilman Marks to <br /> approve as submitted the minutes for the Council meeting held <br /> April 14 , 1981. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Ray Sopcinski presented the actions taken and recommendations made <br /> to the Council by the Planning Commission during their April 21st <br /> meeting. He reported the Commission's concerns regarding the wording <br /> for the proposed ordinance amendment which will permit massage parlors <br /> as conditionally permitted uses, as well as their recommendation that <br /> the distance restriction be raised for such operations , as- had been <br />- expressed during the public hearing on the ordinance change. <br /> Mr. Soth said he could accept the raising of the distance restrictions <br /> from 500 feet to . 600 feet to assure this type of business will not <br /> be requested for the St. Anthony Shopping Center, since there will <br /> will still be a remote site on the Apache property where, although <br /> very unlikely, such an operation would be permitted. He saw this <br /> action as more prudent than prohibiting these businesses from the <br /> City altogether, seeing a challenge of a total prohibition "would <br /> probably pose a difficult legal question for the City" . The City <br /> Attorney said he views the Jacksonville, Florida case, where the <br /> courts upheld that city' s total prohibition of massage parlors , as <br /> unique, rather than a precedent-setting case, and cautioned "there <br /> are no assurances the Minnesota courts will uphold such a concept" . <br /> He concluded by saying, "the fact that no Minnesota municipalities <br /> have totally prohibited- these type of businesses , has led me to <br /> believe if they could have, they certainly would have done so" . <br /> Mr. Soth said. he had no problem with the change in wording but <br /> recommended if the massage parlors and saunas are not accepted as <br /> conditionally permitted uses , an exception should be made in the <br /> ordinance to specifically exclude these .businesses in case they <br /> should take the legal position that they are health spas or other <br /> services permitted in the ordinance. <br /> Mayor Haik said she will have to vote "no" to the ordinance amendment , <br /> preferring to continue the existing City staff approach of informing <br /> prespective operators that these types of businesses are not permitted <br /> under the City zoning ordinance. She believes anyone who applies to <br /> operate such a business under a permitted usage classification can be <br /> told "the Council and City Attorney have ruled the permitted categories <br /> of similar businesses do not include massage parlors" . <br />