CC MINUTES 01261982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-4- to a variance for parking would be required, at this time . However , Councilman Marks indicated he wonders whether there might not be a • need to "loosen up" the or.dinance. requiremen.ts for parking to accomodate the mix of warehousing and industrial usage in a light industrial district. Mr. Swanson told the. Council how pleased he is with the manner in which the City has upgraded Anthony Lane. He said a recent acquisi- tion of land from the C. G. Hill Company has enabled his firm to proceed with expansion of their plant to accomodate a large increase in their business . However, since financing is- so tight, they have decided to go ahead with the shop addition first, hoping the tax exempt bonding will be kept open for the office construction when it becomes feasible . The firm owner then requested his firm be permitted to continue using the trailer office structure they have housed employees in for the past two years , at least until the construction of the shop addition is completed. The Mayor advised him to seek another extension if the project is not completed in July. Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Letourneau to follow the Planning Commission recommendation that the trailer structure parked on the Central Engineering, Inc. site at 2930 Anthony Lane be no longer accepted as a substitute office space past August 1, 1982 unless Central submits an extension request before this date. • Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Soth said he has reviewed the preliminary but not final plat for the site- which- will reflect the relocation of the drainage and utility easement and advised a notice of the easement vacation will have to be filed with the title records . Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Letourneau .to approve the preliminary plat submitted by Central Engineering', Inc. , for the St. Anthony Industrial Park 2nd Addition. Motion carried unanimously . Mr. and Mrs . Robert Rivard, petitioners for a two foot variance to IF-he City Zoning Ordinance sideyard setback requirements for a single family residence were present to discuss their proposed construction of a home on the 50 feet by 150 feet lot at 3224 Roosevelt Street N.E. , which they have an option to purchase from Mr. and Mrs . John Domalik who live just -west of the site at 3226 Roosevelt. Mr. and Mrs . Domalik were also present and indicated they had no objections to the plan as they had indicated on the statement signed by six other adjoining property owners that they "have no objections to the construction of a family home on the lot at 3224 Roosevelt Street N.E. as shown on the sketch (presented at the .January 16th Commission meeting) " . Mr. Berg added that Mr. Pribula who owns the.-vacant lot of the same size across the street at 3227 Roosevelt, had attended • the hearing and indicated he was in favor of the construction. Councilman Ranallo stated he could see no increase in value for the Rivards if the variance is granted.