CC MINUTES 07271982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-13- Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adopt the resolution which accepts the State 's share of the costs of rebuilding • the St. Anthony Boulevard bridge as $213 ,265. 61 .which will result in an increase in the amount of MSA funds the City will have to expend for the project. RESOLUTION 82-037 A RESOLUTION REGARDING PAYMENT OF COSTS FOR ST. ANTHONY BOULEVARD BRIDGE. Motion carried. unanimously . Councilman Marks. reported. that, in. a recent conversation with a resident who.. lives near Silver Point Park, he ' learned that resident -takes her children toa Minneapolis park. to- play because the Minneapolis system provides .sand parks. for younger children, where Silver Point has asphalt paths and play areas . Irving Peterson was present to report the actions taken and recommend- ations madeby the Planning Commission during their July 20.th meeting, as reflected in the minutes of that meeting. Following a report from Mr. Berg and an indication from the ..City Attorney that he would anticipate there would be no legal problems with the 12 foot land transfer requested by. Kenneth Lee, . the. Council took the following action: Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to adopt • Resolution 82-0-36, which. approves the subdivision without platting of a 12 foot strip. of land described as- the. east 12 feet of *Lot 11*, Block 1, Penrod Addition, as .requested by Hedlund, Lee , et al, from the property currently known as. 3909 Silver. Lake' Road to that at 3904 Penrod Lane , as long as the transfer in no way affects the Hedlund PUD requirements , specifically those related to fencing, landscaping and parking. The Council finds, as did the Planning .Commission that: (-11, There was no public opposition demonstrated against the transfer during the public hearing. [2) Thei_transfer is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on the abutting properties andwould not be considered to .in any way diminish the conditions set by the PUD. (3) The existing- large oak tree on the site would probably be saved with. the transfer. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Lee reiterated the reasons he sees for permitting him to construct the five foot, nine gauge fence which will divide these properties rather than to have the redwood fence which Mr. Morris had agreed to construct-' on his side of the property , which according to Mr. Lee "would never be - as durable ,as the chain link fence . " He told the Council the fence he is proposing had been ordered quite a while ago along with the fencing for the other two sides of his property and he had to have all the materials returned because of the confusion of whether or not he would be permitted to constuct the fence on his property. He also said, if the City insists on a six foot height, commer- cial rather than residential type of materials would be required, which