Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br /> At their August 24th meeting, the. .Council had directed the City Attorney <br /> to prepare ordinance amendments which would address the problems they <br /> • perceive for recreational- establishments where people congregate which <br /> are presently classified as Permitted. Uses in the City Zoning Ordinance <br /> and requested these changes be .presented for a public hearing before <br /> the Planning Commission, September 7th. <br /> Doug Jones , Chairman of .the Planning Commission, reported the minutes <br /> of that hearing -and gave the Commission recommendations related to an <br /> ordinance which would change the classification of recreational uses <br /> from Permitted to Conditional Uses ; another which would limit the <br /> hours of operation for certain businesses ; and a third, which would <br /> permit new on-sale beer licenses to be issued only to restaurants . <br /> The Chairman suggested several changes in wording of these minutes be <br /> made as clarification of the Commission 's 'intent. He requested his <br /> own statement . as. to whether a restaurant could remain open all night <br /> be changed - from- "he believed this might be permissible" to "he questioned <br /> whether. it would be allowable" , - and said Mr.. Bjorklund had requested <br /> the words "sell a product or service. to be consumed upon the premises , <br /> ,; and. only these may -- - reasonably-,' be expected" , be inserted after the <br /> word "which" in the third line of. paragraph 2 , Page 8 and "or con- <br /> sumption of product" inserted following "people" in the fifth line of <br /> the third paragraph on the same page. <br /> The Chairman then emphasized that Mr. Bowerman had dissented from <br /> recommending approval- of - the changes , believing to place restrictions <br /> on only six or seven, out of- 56 uses , which. are now classified as <br /> • Permitted Uses would be "too confining" and, "could be viewed as <br /> discriminatory" . However, the majority of the Commission members <br /> agreed with the Council- and the large number of residents who had <br /> attended Council meetings in July .and August, that the existing Zon- <br /> ing Ordinance did not effectively address the problems of -traffic and <br /> late hour disturbances which.-were anticipated by neighbors would <br /> occur in establishments where people are expected-.to,�cong,regate for <br /> recreation or .entertainment. - <br /> Mrs:. Soth was- present to answer questions and objections to the ord- <br /> inance changes from representatives -of the Apache Plaza management <br /> firm and from. Chick 's . . P4ark Kozlak , a St. Anthony resident with a <br /> restaurant operation background, was. again present to speak in- favor <br /> of the ordinance _changes . _ <br /> Councilman -narks responded to Mr. Bowerman's objections to including <br /> only certain business uses in the conditionally permitted classifica- <br /> tion by saying he believed the Council 's overriding concern was related <br /> to activities connected to certain - uses in establishments where people <br /> congregate late ' at night and drink beverages while playing games . He <br /> later indicated he did not believe restaurants , delicatessens or <br /> cafeterias should be included in the categories for which .the changes <br /> were sought. <br /> Mayor. Sundland reported he had sat in on a .portion of the Commission <br /> • hearing.- and perceived the Commission recommendations reflected the <br /> desires of the community expressed during the Council meetings . He <br /> said whether there were 70 or 100 persons in attendance at these <br /> meetings was really irrelevant, as far as he is concerned, because he <br />