CC MINUTES 09281982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-6- 1_3) Conviction of. th.e. owner or any of the employees of the owner for violation of. obscenity laws in the operation of' the : store would • be grounds for revocation of this permit by the City Council. In .granting this permit, the Council finds , as did the Planning Commis- sion, that: (A) The proposed use is one of the conditional uses specifically permitted in the district in which it is located. (B) The proposed conditional use would not be detrimental to the health, safety., or general welfare of persons residing,_:or_work- ing in the vicinity or injurious toproperty values or improvements in the vicinity,. . . (C) The proposed conditional use is possibly necessary or possibly desirable at. the specified location to provide a service or a facility which is in the interest of public convenience and may contribute to the general welfare of the neighborhood or community. (D) There was no opposition to the permit demonstrated during the hearings before the Planning Commission or the Council . (E) A thorough check of the petitioners and other stores they operate had convinced the shopping . center management that this store would be in the best business interest of the owners . Voting on the motion: • Aye : Enrooth, Marks , Sundland, and Letourneau. Nay : Ranallo. Motion carried. Mrs . Makowske conc•luded .her report by -informing the Council that the petition for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which would allow motorcycle accessory sales as a conditional use had been withdrawn by the applicant after the hearing . She then requested the Planning Commission be kept informed as to when the H.R.A. meetings are scheduled. Mr. Childs had included in the agenda packet a listing of checks staff has found to be uncollectible, which he requested be written off so the books could be closed for 1981. He and Chief Hickerson assured the Council every legal process which is economically justified had been followed to collect these monies . The Manager pointed out, however, that a shortage of a little ,more- than a thousandi-~dollars would-.be more than offset by the_._ - liquor operation net profit of $23 ,281. 69 on check cashing. Motion by Councilman Letourneau and seconded by Councilman Marks to authorize the write off of $1 , 350 . 66 in uncollectible checks for the City 's 1981 liquor store operations . Motion carried unanimously.