Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br /> Motion by Councilman Letourneau 'and seconded by Councilman Marks to <br /> approve Change Order #2 in the amount- of $1,277 for the St. Anthony <br /> Boulevard Bridge Project. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> William Zawialak- was present: to report the actions taken by the Planning <br /> Commission during their November. 16 , 1982 meeting as reflected in the <br /> minutes of that meeting. He indicated the Commission had recommended <br /> the signs requested. to identify the two. buildings in the St. Anthony <br /> Office: Park--which are . now inhabited by . Impressions , Inc. ,. be granted <br /> because the total signage would be well below that permitted for <br /> buildings that size and- the proposed .monument signs were designed to <br /> conform to the requirements of the. Sign Ordinance being developed by <br /> the. Commission at this time. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to grant <br /> a variance for. a freestanding sign, four feet wide and not to exceed <br /> three feet high, for the. Impressions , Inc. building at. 2908 Anthony <br /> Lane N.E: , as proposed in Exhibits- A' .and B, finding that the proposed <br /> signage satisfied the conditions set, in the City Sign Ordinance for <br /> granting such a variance as, follows .* <br /> (,l). The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public <br /> welfare or injurious to other property in the neighborhood or <br /> village . <br /> • (2) A particular h.ardship . to the . applicant would -result if the strict <br /> letter of the regulations are adhered -to because there is a need <br /> for identification of and a distinction to be made between the <br /> two buildings. <br /> (3) The conditions upon which the application for a variance is based <br /> are unique to the parcel of land for which the variance is sought <br /> and are not applicable, . generally, to other property within the <br /> same land use classification. <br /> The Council finds further that: <br /> (4) The proposed signage would be. compatible to the: requirements for <br /> monument type signage recommended in the proposed Sign Ordinance. <br /> (5), The proposed signage would be compatible with existing signage <br /> in the office park. <br /> (6) No lighting is proposed for the sign. <br /> (7). No opposition to the request was demonstrated during either the <br /> Commission or Council considerations. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by- Councilman Marks and seconded. by Councilman Enrooth to grant <br /> a variance for a freestanding ,sign, four feet wide and not to' exceed . <br /> three feet .in height, to identify the Impressions , Inc. Annex, The <br /> Math Group, _Inc. , at 2912 Anthony Lane N.E. , as proposed in Exhibits A _ <br /> and B , citing the same findings as for the parent firm at 2908 Anthony <br /> Lane N.E. <br />