Laserfiche WebLink
-10- <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Ranallo, Letourneau, Sundland, and Enrooth. <br /> • Nay : Marks . <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Soth pointed out several areas of potential problem with the word- <br /> ing of the proposed joint purchasing agreement for the fire pumper . <br /> He recommended several changes in wording in the document and indicated <br /> he would research another question about procedure with the Plymouth <br /> attorney before the document is signed. <br /> Motion by Councilman P4arks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to adopt <br /> Resolution 83-041 subject to word changes recommended by the City <br /> Attorney and his clarification of procedures before the agreement is <br /> signed. <br /> RESOLUTION 83-041 <br /> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER <br /> TO SIGN THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT <br /> FOR THE PURCHASE OF FIRE APPARATUS <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Prior to the Council meeting that evening, the Council had conducted <br /> a public hearing on the City' s 1984 .budget and tax levy and the, Manager <br /> had addressed changes in the Water Department budget which had been <br /> made in his cover memorandum with the .proposed resolution. <br /> Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to <br /> adopt Resolution 83-042 . <br /> RESOLUTION 83-042 <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1983 TAX LEVY, <br /> COLLECTIBLE IN 19.84 AND THE 1984 CITY BUDGET <br /> Motion carried unanimously . <br /> Motion by Councilman Ranallo and seconded by Councilman Marks to <br /> approve the second reading of Ordinance 1983-005 , establishing fee <br /> charges for licenses and permit with the changes in wording recommended <br /> by the City Attorney in his letter of September 27 , 1983. <br /> ORDINANCE 1983-005 <br /> AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO MISCELLANEOUS LICENSES AND PERMIT <br /> CHARGES, MIENDING .SECTIONS 510 AND 560 OF <br /> THE 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> • A Planning Commission member had raised the question whether the $30 <br /> proposed to be charged contractors might be too high for some and <br /> Councilman Ranallo indicated he perceives the fee which would only be <br /> charged once could easily . be absorbed in the contractor's charges to <br />