My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 12131983
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1983
>
CC MINUTES 12131983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 6:08:19 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 6:08:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1983
SP Name
CC MINUTES 12131983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> approved IDB's for .a .new .business in the City, which had created a <br /> • number of new jobs , as well as the rehabilitation of another shopping <br /> center. Councilman Enrooth commented the proposed legislation appeared. <br /> to him to be- an overreaction .to a few instances of bond misuse which <br /> could only be perceived to be a .case of "throwing the baby out with <br /> the bathwater" . Mr. Mosher indicated Senator Boschwitz believes the <br /> proposed capping of the. funding could seriously harm Minnesota pro- <br /> jects like St. Anthony' s but is hopeful that, with the strong op- <br /> position, like the Leagues ' which has been generated towards that <br /> legislation, Congress might abandon the -per capita. limitations . <br /> When he indicated he didn' t know a lot about the City ' s project, <br /> Mr. -Childs was requested to inform him about the Kenzie Terrace <br /> Redevelopment Project and its importance to the City. <br /> The Mayor and Councilman Marks told Mr. Mosher how grateful they had <br /> been for the support they received when they were in Washington from <br /> all the Minnesota delegation when they had approached H.U.D. officials <br /> to find out why the 40 unit senior subsidized housing project had not <br /> been approved for St. Anthony and to establish just what the ground <br /> rules would be for submitting a similar project which is a vital part <br /> of the Kenzie Project again next year. The Mayor told the aide .he <br /> would again, be seeking Senator Boschwitz ' help with H.U.D. on that <br /> project when he is in Washington in March. <br /> Senator Boschwitz had been one of nine senators who had voted against <br /> Senate Bill #66 , the federal cable telecommunication. which would come <br /> • up again as soon- as Congress convenes, according to Mr. Mosher . He <br /> said the Senator believed that the control of cable franchises should <br /> remain in local hands and was hopeful that the full House would be <br /> more open to amending the bill before its passage. <br /> Councilman Ranallo requested that Mr. Mosher express. the. Council ' s <br /> gratitude to all those persons in the. Senator ' s office who had achieved <br /> what is almost impossible when they had secured passes for a family <br /> of 12 from St. Anthony to tour the White House while they were in <br /> Washington D.C. testifying before Senator Denton' s hearing on adoptions . <br /> Mr. Childs was directed to again write to the City'_s congressional <br /> representatives to indicate the City' s continued opposition to the <br /> proposed cap on Industrial Development Bonds . Mr. Mosher indicated <br /> he would personally deliver that message to Senator Boschwitz and <br /> urged the Council to keep the Senator informed related to the City ' s <br /> concerns about other proposed legislation. <br /> The continuance of the discussion of the conditional use permit request <br /> from Elmwood Lutheran Church was moved up on the agenda. The matter <br /> had been tabled at the Council 's August 23rd meeting to permit further <br /> negotiation of differences between church officials and the abutting <br /> neighbors related to the church ' s request to construct a 75 foot addi- <br /> tion to. the existing church structure at 3615 Chelmsford, which had <br /> also been conditionally permitted in a residential district. <br /> • The Planning Commission had taken testimony .on .the proposal at both <br /> their July 19th and August 16th meeting and when the church officials <br /> and neighbors had failed to compromise their differences , had <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.