Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br /> steps which had been taken to facilitate the availability of Small <br /> Business Administration loans for homes and businesses which had <br /> suffered losses in excess of 40% which were under or not insured. <br /> Mr. Soth ' s May 16th letter to Mr. Childs had indicated there was <br /> little possibility that the City would receive state disaster aid and <br /> the Manager indicated he perceived no . reason to have the state make <br /> an audit since it appeared such an audit would make little or no <br /> difference and would have to be paid for by the City. <br /> The Manager recommended the City accept Hennepin .County' s proposal. to <br /> provide assessing services in 19.85 for $16 ,900 which was less than <br /> they, charged the City in 1984 . <br /> Motion by Councilman- Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to <br /> adopt -Resolution 84-026 . <br /> RESOLUTION 84-026 <br /> A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND <br /> CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT <br /> WITH THE HENNEPIN COUNTY ASSESSOR FOR <br /> ASSESSING SERVICES IN 1985 <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Councilman Makowske indicated she had received numerous calls from <br /> residents whose trees had been damaged in the tornado who had been <br /> • unable to get their branches out in the street before the City cut <br /> off the emergency, chipping services .without notice to the residents <br /> that the service had been terminated.. One of those callers , Allan <br /> Brown, 3523 Harding Street N.E. , who was present, questioned whether <br /> there would be enough. cases like his to involve a major pickup effort <br /> by the City. <br /> Mr. Childs responded by saying the chipping service had been discon- <br /> tinued' at <br /> iscon-tinued. at the end of ten days after the tornado because of the cost <br /> and the fact that contractors were abusing the program by throwing <br /> debris out in the streets whichthe residents had already paid them <br /> to haul away. Now that he had told so many residents. the City could <br /> no longer take care of their branches free of charge, the Manager <br /> indicated he was concerned those persons might become angry to find <br /> the service had been reinstated after they had made other arrangements <br /> for their branch. removal. He added that City crews had become so far <br /> behind in their. regular spring projects__ _ that those jobs would have <br /> to be completed before another-:chipping program could be undertaken. <br /> Councilmen Ranallo and Makowske had indicated they had reservations <br /> about not extending the service because the City had not published the <br /> date of the cutoff and "two weeks didn't seem to be an inordinate. time <br /> to provide the service to the residentsin an emergency" , but they <br /> finally concurred that the 'City had to draw the line somewhere and <br /> that the City. crews could go back to .chip the branches which- are still <br /> • in the streets at a. nominal charge, whenever they could work it into <br /> .er <br /> their schedule. The 'was further agreement tha-t this service would <br /> not include removal of stumps. <br />