Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> Councilman Enrooth was assured by the City Manager that 1985 City contribution to <br /> the Suburban Cable Commission budget would be reimbursed to all member cities from <br /> • either an advance on franchise fees or from the $150,000 indemnification from <br /> Group W, if the amendment agreement with Group W would not be signed. The Coucil- <br /> man was told the Commission had decided to seek this contribution because the <br /> signing of the agreement had been delayed when one of the city members, Mounds <br /> View, had encountered a problem with their city charter to adopt the agreement. <br /> However, Mr. Soth indicated he understood that problem had been resolved and no <br /> further delays in signing the agreement were anticipated. <br /> Councilmembers Marks and Ranallo arrived at 7:37 P.M. during this discussion. <br /> Motion by Councilman Makowske and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to approve payment <br /> of $9,294 as the City's 1985 contribution to the Suburban Cable Commission budget. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to approve payment of <br /> $9,554.40 to GM Truck & Bus Group for the purchase of the one ton truck, bid <br /> through the Hennepin County Purchasing group. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Ron Hansen reported the March 19th Planning Commission minutes and the recommendations <br /> to the Council reflected therein. <br /> The Commission spokesman reiterated that the intent of the proposed amendment of the <br /> • City Ordinance as it related to accessory buildings had been to prohibit eaves from <br /> encroaching beyond approved setbacks between houses and garages. Mr. Childs indicated <br /> the bay windows which had -aroused . so much controversy last summer would not be <br /> effected by the proposed amendment, since it would not address setbacks between <br /> principal structures. Councilman Mar..ks recalled that when the Zoning Ordinances had <br /> been rewritten in 1976 there had been a great deal of discussion about accessory <br /> buildings and portions of those buildings encroaching property lines, but the City <br /> Manager at that time had indicated he perceived the problem had been effectively <br /> addressed in the final ordinance draft. <br /> Councilman Makowske's proposal for a third finding in addition to the Commission's <br /> for Ordinance 1985-002 was accepted, along with the following changes in the ordinance <br /> itself proposed by the City Attorney to assure the Council 's intentions related- to <br /> the encroachments had been clearly specified: <br /> ORDINANCE 1985-002 <br /> AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 , ITEMS 2 AND 4 <br /> OF SUBDIVISION 2 OF APPENDIX I OF THE <br /> 1973 CODE OF ORDINANCES <br /> The City Council of the City of St. Anthony hereby ordains: <br /> Section 1 , Items 2 and 4 of the Subdivision 2 of Appendix I of the 1973 Code <br /> of Ordinances are hereby amended to read as follows: <br /> • Subdivision 2. Accessory Buildings. <br /> 2. No accessory building, or eave, or any other portion of accessory <br /> building shall be located within three feet of any property line. <br />