Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br /> The Mayor indicated he perceived any concerns or issues the Commission had during <br /> • their hearing had been satisfactorily addressed in the motion, as confirmed by <br /> Commissioner Madden. Although he wanted it clearly understood the situation was <br /> not an. acceptable one, the Mayor indicated he perceived the location and July 1st <br /> date provided unique circumstances in this case, <br /> Commissioner Enrooth indicated he perceived the July lst date to be the applicant's <br /> and not the Council-'s, problem but believed the logical procedure for .the Commission <br /> to have followed if they wanted the applicant to appear first before them would <br /> have been to lay the matter over for another.month. The Councilmember added he <br /> had seen nothing in the minutes to indicate the Commission didn't like the business <br /> which was proposed, but rather had only taken issue with what the school was <br /> .going to be. <br /> The Manager said he had given the Commission two options for a decision and they <br /> had decided that, rather than delay the opening of the facility any longer.,,than <br /> necessary, it would be preferable to recommend denial , which:th:e Council- could <br /> reverse if the appl,icant• gave satisfactory assurances related `to those concerns. <br /> Commissioner Madden confirmed that had been the Commission's intention in making <br /> the motion they had. <br /> Councilman Ranallo wanted to know where that was reported in the minutes and when <br /> the Secretary pointed out the Manager's statements on Page 3, indicated he thought <br /> the matter could have been stated more directly in the minutes. <br /> Mr. Childs said he perceived the Commission considered his speculations to be a part <br /> of the motion input. Commissioner Madden indicatedthat had also been his perception. <br /> • Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Makowske, Marks, Sundland Land Enrooth. <br /> Nay: Ranallo. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Bernard Blanske was present for Commissioner Madden's report on his ,request for a <br /> variance from the City Zoning Ordinance setback regulations which would allow <br /> Mr. Blanske to construct a second floor -addition to the existing central area of <br /> the mini-warehouses he owns and rents at 3829 Foss Road. The variance would allow <br /> a 33 foot setback, identical to that allowed the original building, from Sunset <br /> Lane, where the Ordinance requires 40 feet. <br /> Mr. Soth indicated he saw a technical problem with putting conditions on a variance <br /> as recommended by the Planning Commission. He said it would be appropriate to put <br /> conditions on a conditional use permit because the City is authorizing the use and <br /> those would be the conditions under which the use would be permitted. If a variance <br /> with conditions is granted and those conditions should be violated, it would not be <br /> appropriate to require the owner to remove the building. The Attorney indicated he <br /> therefore perceived there might -be a probtiem. with the conditions listed under (a)., <br /> (_b), and (c) in the Commission's recommendation for approval . The findings, however, <br /> would be appropriate, Mr. Soth said. <br /> Mr. Blanske stated his buil"ding(s) had security lights lit from 5:00 P.M. on and <br /> his hours of operation are officially from 7 A.M. to 7 P.M. but;L.in summer the units <br />