My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 07231985
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1985
>
CC MINUTES 07231985
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 5:57:26 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 5:57:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
21
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1985
SP Name
CC MINUTES 07231985
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- 5- <br /> • the NSP representative had estimated their charges would probably match NSP's <br /> for putting their service underground. The cable company would, however, have to <br /> change their lines at their own expense,. he added. The Manager added that the cost <br /> of the project, if passed on to the developer, would most likely make the develop- <br /> ment economically unfeasible and there would probably be another problem for him if <br /> two of those lots have been already sold, as rumored. <br /> Commissioner Bowerman indicated the Commission had also noted, as had Councilmember <br /> Makowske, that the Comprehensive Plan wording required only"promotion" of under- <br /> ground wiring for the overhead lines for redevelopment projects but it was his <br /> understanding that provision of underground wiring to serve the individual lots had <br /> been specifically required as a condition for the preliminary platting approval . <br /> When- Councilmember Enrooth wondered if the utility companies couldn't at least <br /> clean up the appearance of the heavy lines in front of this project, Councilmember <br /> Ranallo said this was not an isolated case since all the wiring in that neighbor- <br /> hood all the way into Minneapolis are the "same mess". Mr. Childs concurred, <br /> saying this was probably true of almost all the established metropolitan munici- <br /> palities and the only exception are newly developed areas like Plymouth, West <br /> Bloomington, etc. , which Commissioner Bjorklund talked about during the last <br /> Commission meeting. <br /> Mayor Sundland indicated that because of his association with the telephone company, <br /> he would not be voting on the motion related to this project, but he was certain <br /> Northwestern Bell 's philosophy about who would have to pay for changing of their <br /> • lines would be the same as NSP's unless the change could be proved to be of direct <br /> benefit to the company. The Mayor pointed out that he had been able to convince <br /> Bell to put their lines underground along Stinson from 33rd over the hill when <br /> they were upgrading the service to that area but that the project took nearly ten <br /> years to get approved. Mayor Sundland also said, whenever the State of Minnesota <br /> requires the telephone company to move their service for a road widening project, <br /> the state has to pay for the change. However, if the City ever has a large <br /> redevelopment project like the Salvation Army property, the utility companies would <br /> naturally have to provide all services underground, he added. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Makowske and seconded by Councilmember Marks to approve the <br /> final platting for Johnson Manor, a nine lot and two outlot subdivision between <br /> 33rd Avenue N.E. and 34th Avenue N.E. , east of Edward Street N.E. , as proposed in <br /> the final plat for the project presented for approval at both the July 16th Commission <br /> and July 23, 1985 Council meetings, subject to the title document being approved by <br /> the City Attorney and to the provision of underground utility lines for cable, <br /> electric, and telephone to each individual lot in conformance with Item #4 of the <br /> Section of Public Utility/Service Policy in the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> In approving -th.e final plat, the Council finds, as did the Planning Commission, that: <br /> 1 . Both the Commission and Council had held public hearings on the preliminary <br /> platting; <br /> 2. No one appeared at any consideration of the proposal to object to the proposed <br /> platting and there were a number of neighbors who did testify i.n favor of the <br /> • proposed plat and project during the Commission's May 18, 1985 hearing; <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.