Laserfiche WebLink
-4- <br /> The meeting was recessed from 7:57 P.M. to 8:01 P.M. , after which time the Mayor <br /> • opened the public hearing scheduled to consider the allocation of the City's $45,000 <br /> Revenue Sharing budget for 1986. The public had been invited to provide input to <br /> the Council 's decision regarding these expenditures, first at an executive meeting <br /> of the Council , September 24th, and, finally, at the hearing that evening. Although <br /> both hearings had been publicized in the Bulletin, there had been no response from <br /> the public before or during either Council consideration of the budget and the <br /> evening's hearing was closed at 8:05 P.M. for Council action. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Marks and seconded by Councilmember Enrooth to adopt the <br /> resolution which approves-;the expenditure of $25,000 in Revenue Sharing funds for <br /> building repairs and $20,000 for capital equipment purchases in 1986. <br /> RESOLUTION 85-041 <br /> A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1986 <br /> REVENUE SHARING BUDGET <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> At 8:06 P.M. , the public hearing was opened to consider the proposed 1986 City <br /> budget of $1,723,500 and the 1985 tax levy of $913,000, which would be collectible <br /> in 1986. The notice of the hearing had been published in the Bulletin September 17th <br /> and the proposed budget had been developed during three open wort sessions con- <br /> ducted by the Council . The Manager had distributed copies of the summary which <br /> staff had prepared on the budget in which comparisons had been drawn between the <br /> 1986 General Fund expenditures and revenues and those for years 1984 and 1985 and <br /> • the relationships between the proposed General Fund budget and various groups of <br /> expenditures and revenues and the projected sanitary sewer and water funds ex- <br /> penditures for 1986 which were illustrated on graphs by percentages. <br /> Mr. Childs estimated the $913,000 to be levied in 1985 represented a mill rate of <br /> about 14.45 mills, or a 1 .5 mill increase from the 1984 levy, based on the assumption <br /> that there would be very little in assessed valuations for 1985. The Mayor attri- <br /> buted the increase, for the most part, to the increase in insurance premiums charged <br /> the City for coverage it has to carry to provide adequate protection. Those <br /> insurance costs, the Mayor said, accounted for about 65% of the total budget increase. <br /> Although the mill rate would be raised with this budget, property taxes on a majority <br /> of the homes in St. Anthony would probably not go up because of the increase in <br /> Homestead credit from $650 to $700 allowed by the legislature this year, the <br /> Manager added. <br /> Noting the apparent lack of objections to the budget demonstrated by the absence <br /> of residents to provide input to the considerations, the hearing was closed at <br /> 8:10 P.M. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Marks and seconded by Councilmember Makowske to adopt the <br /> resolution which approve§ the proposed $1 ,723,000 budget for the City of St. Anthony <br /> for 1986 and the 1985 tax levy of $913,000 collectible in 1986. <br /> RESOLUTION 85-042 <br /> • A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE 1985 TAX LEVY, <br /> COLLECTIBLE IN 1985 AND THE 1986 CITY BUDGET <br /> Motion carried unanimously. - <br />