Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br /> Mr. Hensel said the omission of the height of the proposed fence had only been <br /> an oversight on his own part because he had intended to state that the proposed <br /> fence would be between 5 or 6 feet tall depending on what 's necessary to construct <br /> it on the crest of the church property on that side. There would also be .several <br /> . shrubs planted on the west side of the fence to define the property line, he <br /> added. <br /> Mr. McNulty indicated he recognized the budgetary -restrictions the church was <br /> facing in this project and, as long as the church takes the necessary steps to <br /> allow him to enjoy his own property, it would make no difference to him what <br /> materials were used in the curbing, especially if providing concrete would cause <br /> the church to cut. back on the quality of the buffer between their properties . <br /> Mayor Sundland said the condition imposed by the Council gave Mr. McNulty the <br /> right to complain if he had any problems with the existing tree on the parking <br /> lot property. The Mayor also indicated he perceived the church had provided a <br /> satisfactory solution to the drainage problems experienced in the past on the <br /> west parking lot. Mr. Childs said he so far had been unable to find a record <br /> of any landscaping plan between Mr. Porter and the church 30 years ago. <br /> Mayor. Sundland indicated he perceived it would be more important for the church <br /> to show Mr. McNulty the grading plan they have for the new parking 1-ot because <br /> the protection that would provide, not the type of curbing used, would make all <br /> the difference. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Marks and seconded by Councilmember Ranallo to grant the <br /> • request from Nativity Lutheran Church for a conditional use permit in an R-1 , <br /> single family residence district, which would allow the construction of the <br /> proposed addition to the west side of the existing church building at 3312 Silver <br /> Lake Road, and the expansion of their parking facilities onto the property which <br /> had been acquired for that purpose on the corner of Silver Lake Road and 33rd <br /> Avenue N.E. , as presented in the building, site, and parking plans for the <br /> project which had been included in the November 19, 1985 Planning Commission and <br /> Council November 26th agenda packets, finding that the petitioners had affirmed <br /> that the following conditions required by Minnesota statutes and City ordinances <br /> � <br /> o 'be satisfied before a conditional use permit can be authorized, had been <br /> satisfied: <br /> 1 . The proposed conditional use is •one- of=the c_ onditional use specifically �.r• <br /> listed for the zoning district in which it is located; <br /> 2. The proposed conditional use is necessary or desirable at the above location <br /> to provide a service or a facility :which is in the interest of the public <br /> convenience and will contribute to the general welfare •of the neighborhood <br /> or community; and <br /> 3. The proposed conditional use will not be detrimental to the health, safety, <br /> or general welf are' of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or <br /> injurious to property values or improvements in the vicinity, as long as the <br /> following conditions, attached as a part of this motion, are met: <br /> a. that a landscaping plan be submitted by the Nativity Lutheran Church <br /> a showing and addressing screening of the west side of the new parking lot <br /> and, the Council recommends that consideration be also given to providing <br /> landscaping for the northern portion of the west parking lot, as had <br /> reportedly been agreed to previously; <br />