Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> • COUNCIL MINUTES <br /> December 3, 1985 <br /> The meeting was opened at 7:30 P.M. with the Pledge of Allegiance led by Mayor <br /> Sundland. <br /> Present for roll call : Sundland, Marks, Ranallo, Enrooth, and Makowske. <br /> Also present: David Childs, City Manager. <br /> The November 26th Council minutes were deferred to their next meeting, December 17th, <br /> to give the Council members more time to read them. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Marks and seconded by Council member Enrooth to approve <br /> payment of the billing for' $26,813.15 from the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> The Planning Commission' s regularly scheduled meeting on the 17th had been rescheduled <br /> to the previous evening in order that the Commissioners could act on the Arkell <br /> Development request for an amendment to the Development Concept Plan for the Kenzie <br /> Terrace Redevelopment Project under the P.U.D. Ordinance so Housing Redevelopment <br /> Bonds could be issued for the project before passage of federal legislation which, <br /> it was presumed, would alter the nature of the housing and tax increment bonds <br /> • deemed necessary to make the project economically feasible. <br /> Brad Bjorklund reported the summation of motions from the December 2nd meeting of <br /> the Planning Commission, indicating he perceived they accurately reflected the sense <br /> of the Commission pertaining to the Arkell request and, with some clarification in <br /> wording, the other matters the Commissioners had been requested to act on that <br /> evening. <br /> The amendment proposed for the final phases of the' Kenzie Terrace Project would allow <br /> the change of use from market rate condominiums to market rate elderly rental with <br /> the inclusion of resident service oriented commercial in the first phase. The <br /> Commission representative indicated that, with the exception of concerns he and <br /> Commissioner Madden had about inclusion of the commercial in the project, the general <br /> consensus of the Commission had been that the change in housing would be an accurate <br /> reflection of changes in the market since the original proposal had been approved <br /> several years ago. When their motion to eliminate the commercial failed, Commissioner <br /> Bjorklund indicated, he and Commissioner Madden had voted in the affirmative for the <br /> entire change because they were in agreement with the Planning Commission Chair's <br /> statement that the Commission would not want to hinder the developers' ability to <br /> proceed with the project, which would be good for both the City and that particular <br /> area. <br /> Steve Yurick and Gary Tushie of Arkell Development were present to discuss their <br /> request and Mr. Yurick indicated he agreed with Commissioner Bowerman 's suggestion <br /> the previous evening that the commercial , for which the developers only had tentative <br /> plans at this point, not become focal point of the project considerations because <br /> those amenities had been included in the project in response to suggestions from <br />