Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br /> In accepting these changes, the Council , as dial the Planning Commission, finds that : <br /> • 1 . The request for the change was precipitated by changing market conditions; <br /> 2. The information from the developers indicated there is a demographic market <br /> for rental property; <br /> 3. Requiring the developers to continue to be bound by the original P.U.D. Concept <br /> Development Plan would be burdensome and not in tune with today's market condi- <br /> tions, which could constitute a hardship for them; and <br /> 4. No member of the public, including the merchants from the adjacent shopping area, <br /> spoke against the changes during the December 2nd Planning Commission hearing, <br /> the Council consideration of the project, December 3rd, or to staff, prior to <br /> either meeting. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> As he read the Commission's motion recommending Council grant the variances <br /> necessary for META Operating Limited Partnership to proceed with their plans for <br /> remodeling and redeveloping the American Legion and gas station property adjacent <br /> to the Kenzington project, Commissioner Bjorklund suggested several changes in the <br /> wording of #2 pertaining to the expansion of non-conforming setback encroachment <br /> behind the gas station, which might better reflect the intent of the maker. These <br /> changes were accepted in the Council ' s motion of approval of the project. <br /> META's Vice President, Greg Gustafson, and the architect for the proposed project, <br /> • James R. Guttormson of Environmental Expressions, who had also attended the Com- <br /> mission hearing the previous evening, answered Council questions about their proposal . <br /> When Councilmember Makowske asked whether the Commission had taken any action related <br /> to the gas storage tanks, she had been told were still in the ground on the gas <br /> station property, Mr. Gustafson indicated his firm had made only a cursory inspection <br /> of the property they had acquired, but assured her that, if such tanks were in <br /> existence, they would be removed whether or not his firm was granted the variances <br /> for the project they had proposed. The developer also indicated META had only <br /> presumed that the walls of the existing Legion Club building could structurally <br /> support a third story, but, if the costs proved too prohibitive, a different <br /> decision might be necessary related to the development of that property. <br /> Mr. Gustafson discussed the drawings of th.e proposed project indicating the two <br /> buildings would be connected cosmetically with a roof architecturally similar to <br /> the Kenzington and a drive thru. He said the primary purpose for buying the two <br /> structures had been to clean up the area adjacent to the Kenzington and to provide <br /> ancillary and supportive services for the condominium project. <br /> No attempt had been made yet to find tenants for the new project, the developer <br /> indicated, but the first assumption had been that they might be professional offices <br /> because space would necessarily have to be quite expensive to offset META's costs <br /> of constructing a project as small as this one, which, Mr. Gustafson added, his firm <br /> would never have attempted if the property were not only 15 feet away from the <br /> Kenzington. Councilmember Ranallo commented, half in jest, that the City might even <br /> be able to use' the space. <br /> • Motion by Councilmember Ranallo and seconded by Councilmember Marks to grant the <br /> request from META Operating Limited Partnership, 7400 Metro Boulevard, Edina, for <br />