Laserfiche WebLink
-6- <br /> for some municipalities had been included in the agenda packet, but there was <br /> little interest on the Council for increasing their annual dues to support the <br /> • program. <br /> Mr. Childs gave a brief overview of the copies of letters, etc. dealing with the <br /> actions taken related to the City's water contamination problems which he had <br /> included in the agenda packet for the Council 's information. The Council concurred <br /> that a short meeting with the City's counsel Briggs and Morgan related to the next <br /> legal decision steps to be taken would be appropriate at this time. An Executive <br /> Session was scheduled for 7:30 P.M., Monday, February 24th, to meet with Briggs <br /> and Morgan. Mr. Childs indicated he expected the draft of the feasibility study <br /> recommending engineering alternatives for the City's water supply would be completed <br /> by Camp, Dresser, and McKee, Inc. sometime in February. <br /> In his January 24th memorandum, the Manager had reported the research he had done at <br /> Council direction related to terms of office for other municipality mayors had <br /> indicated that four years terms were not uncommon for either statutory or charter <br /> cities. A check of state statutes and with the City Attorney had indicated that <br /> only a simple ordinance was necessary to make the change from two to four years <br /> for the City's Mayor, and Mr. Soth had advised that, if the ordinance were passed <br /> in 1986, the change would be effective for the next election in 1987. <br /> Councilmembers Ranallo and Makowske indicated they certainly supported the passage <br /> of the ordinance this year when no claim could be made that the change promoted <br /> the candidacy of any particular person. When Councilmember Marks indicated he had <br /> mixed feelings about making the change because he perceived having the Mayor run <br /> each time a Councilmember ran for office would assure the same public interest in <br /> • each election. Councilmember Makowske said she certainly saw his point but, <br /> because she views the Mayor as one member of a five member Council , she could see <br /> no justification for treating him or her differently when it came to term of office. <br /> Councilmember Enrooth agreed the Mayor should receive equal treatment in that <br /> regard. <br /> Councilmember Makowske said the fact that the ordinance has to be given three <br /> readings should give residents ample opportunity to provide input to the process: <br /> Councilmember Marks said that in the face of the usual resident apathy about what <br /> happens at Council meetings, he perceived a special effort would have to be made <br /> to publicize the change and to generate public debate on the issue. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Ranallo and seconded by Councilmember Makowske to request <br /> staff to draft an ordinance for Council consideration which would change the <br /> Mayor's term of office from two to four years for the next election. <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Ranallo, Makowske, and Enrooth. <br /> Nay: Marks. <br /> Abstention: Sundland. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> • The discussion of public reaction to City issues prompted Councilmember Ranallo to <br /> ask Mr. Childs what response there had been to the survey in the last Newsletter <br />