CC MINUTES 10281986 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-2- Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $1 ,725.20 to the Briggs • and Morgan law firm for consulting services through September 30, 1986 in conjunction with the City' s law suit against the U.S. Army et al related to St. Anthony's water contamination problems. Motion carried unanimously. Motion by Marks, seconded by Ranallo to approve payment of $3,409.46 to BWBR Architects for consulting services as of October 7, 1986 related to the proposed construction and remodeling of the Stonehouse Bar and Liquor Lounge. Motion carried unanimously. _REPORT ON OCTOBER 14 , 1986 PLANNING COMMIS— SION MEETING — COMMISSIONER R _ WERENICZ ROBERT PARMELEE REQUEST FOR SETBACK VARIANCE FOR 2501 PAHL AVENUE N.E. Application for: setback variance from Zoning Ordinance requirements. Proponents: Robert and Judy Parmelee, owner/residents. Opponents: None. Staff input: recommend approval . Commission recommendation: unanimously approved with conditions. • Council Action Motion by Ranallo, seconded by Marks to grant an 11 foot variance to the Ordinance requirement for 30 foot corner lot setbacks to Robert L. Parmelee which would allow him to add another stall to the existing attached garage and to extend the breezeway on the home at 2501 Pahl Avenue N.E. six feet further west to bring it into align- ment with the garage, on the conditions that: *the five foot, three inch gap between the garage and the building Mr. Parmelee uses to store automobiles he collects and renovates, be maintained through construction and afterwards, by removing the overhang on that outbuilding, if necessary; and *the pickup truck parked between the buildings be disposed of. In granting the variance, the Council finds, as did the Planning Commission, that: 1 . the applicant had answered all three questions in the application in the affirmative as required by statute; 2. no one appeared to speak against the variance at either the October 14th Commission hearing or October 28th Council consideration and staff re- ported receiving no calls related to the variance prior to either meeting; 3. the alleyway between this property and St. Anthony Boulevard is not a • throughway, and, therefore, a 30 foot setback might be excessive in this case; and 4. extending the breezeway would bring it into alignment. with the existing garage.