Laserfiche WebLink
-9- <br /> City' s Assessment Policy should require Boulevard property <br /> owners to pay for the improvements because St. Anthony had <br /> gotten the street under an "easement grant" from the <br /> Minneapolis Park Board; <br /> - contended the purpose of the easement grant had been to <br /> prov �:e�-`3c�^'easy'aid='egress oto-'�3�SW; <br /> - said the grant was "from tree to tree" and stipulated that <br /> the "City of St. Anthony had to maintain all the distance <br /> between" ; <br /> - said he thought a "different situation" existed for <br /> St. Anthony Boulevard residents who have no driveways and <br /> now suffer an increase in traffic which "could cause some <br /> of the homes to have lost some of their value" ; <br /> - indicated he believed it was because the home owners had <br /> fought to keep the road 32 feet wide that "we now have a <br /> beautiful, well done Boulevard" ; <br /> - recalled that the first residents on that street had planted <br /> all the trees in the boulevards. <br /> • Muriel Bochnak, 2600 St. Anthony Boulevard: <br /> - registered a complaint about the "corner houses not being <br /> assessed. " <br /> - wanted to know when the assessment policy which stipulated <br /> this treatment had been passed; <br /> - wanted to know when the side streets, particularly the <br /> storm sewers, would be reconstructed, saying she under- <br /> stood this would eliminate some of the flooding problems <br /> on the Boulevard; <br /> - questioned whether taxpayers would have to pay for "trees <br /> which will probably not make it through the winter after <br /> the contractor dug too close to them. " ; <br /> - reported her flagstone sidewalk had to be replaced after <br /> mistakenly being torn up by the contractor; <br /> - told about a workman who urinated right in front of her <br /> front window; <br /> - was concerned that her dinner guests the next week might <br /> be tagged for parking in front of her home. <br /> • <br />