Laserfiche WebLink
I Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $564.86 <br /> 40 to the Dorsey & Whitney law firm for legal services to the City of St. <br /> Anthony during January, 1989. <br /> 4 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 5 Motion by Marks, seconded by Makowske to approve payment of $930.54 to <br /> 6 Short-Elliott-Hendrickson, Inc. for engineering services from December <br /> 7 25, 1988 through January 21, 1989 relative to the replacement of the <br /> 8 Foss Road sewage pumping station. <br /> 9 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 10 City About $10,000 Ahead With Cable Franchise <br /> 11 Councilmember Enrooth made the above observation after viewing the March <br /> 12 1st letter from the North Suburban Cable Commission Administrator with <br /> 13 and the attached 1988 franchise check for $17,126.44 which he compared <br /> 14 to the billing for $1,035.00 representing the City's 1989 contribution <br /> 15 towards the NSCC costs. <br /> 16 Council Action <br /> 17 Motion by Enrooth, seconded by Marks to approve payment of $7,035.00 as <br /> 18 the 1989 franchise fee to the North Suburban Cable Commission. <br /> 4VMotion carried unanimously. <br /> 20 REPORTS <br /> 21 COUNCIL REPORTS <br /> -2=2 Neighbors' Differences to be Mediated by dispute Resolution Center <br /> 23 Councilmember Makowske reported receiving several calls from neighbors <br /> 24 who had differed over one neighbor's snow plowing onto another <br /> 25 neighbor's driveway and path left for the mail carrier. She indicated <br /> 26 the matter would be referred to the Dispute Resolution Center. It was <br /> 27 generally agreed that the City Manager was correct in saying the Center <br /> 28 would be the "perfect forum" for airing neighbor disagreements like this <br /> 29 one which appeared to be of a longstanding nature. <br /> 30 Councilmember Enrooth Urges Implementation of Recycling Program in St. <br /> 31 Anthony <br /> 32 The Councilmember recommended the time lines for the program be updated <br /> 33 to allow enough time for the City Attorney and Solid Waste Committee <br /> 34 to review the final draft of the Refuse Licensing Ordinance, a <br /> 35 preliminary draft of which had been included in the Council's agenda <br /> 36 packet that evening. He said considering how long it could take to <br /> 37 review, publish and give the ordinance three readings, he was concerned <br /> 38 that the City's program might not be in place before the deadline when <br /> • 3 <br />