Laserfiche WebLink
• 10 <br /> 1 concern that three dogs in the house might result in <br /> 2 deterioration of the real estate . Mr . Hodges objected to <br /> 3 that conclusion, and stated that their previous home in <br /> 4 St . Paul was maintained well and sold for a profit and that <br /> 5 they intend to maintain and improve their property in <br /> 6 St . Anthony. Mayor Pro Tem Ranallo reminded the Council. <br /> 7 that they have the right to a report by a public health <br /> 8 officer . Council Member Enrooth added that , should a <br /> 9 problem develop, approval could be withdrawn . <br /> 10 <br /> 11 Council Member Makowske asked at what time the neighbors ' <br /> 12 comments were solicited, and was informed that the comments <br /> 13 were received near the end of October, shortly after Hodges <br /> 14 and Bartel moved in. Mr . Hodges stated that two of their <br /> 15 neighbors expressly welcomed them and their dogs to the <br /> 16 neighborhood when they -roved in . He commented that he and <br /> 17 Mr. Bartel investigated the issue with the City immediately <br /> 18 upon moving to the neighborhood in an effort to cooperate <br /> 19 with community requirements . <br /> 20 <br /> 21 Motion by Marks , seconded by Enrooth , to approve three dogs <br /> 22 in the home at 3209 36th avenue Northeast subject to the <br /> 23 condition that the dog ordinance is not violated and the <br /> • 24 dogs become a nuisance . <br /> ^5 <br /> 26 Council Member Makowske stated that she orininal3y intended <br /> 27 to vote in favor of approval but would vote against it <br /> 28 because the majority of neighbors (five out of nine) who had <br /> 99 expressed an opinion expressed opposition to three dogs in <br /> 30 the household , although she recognized and appreciated <br /> 31 Hodges ' s and Bartel ' s cooperation. <br /> 32 <br /> 33 Aye: Enrooth , Marks , Ranallo . <br /> 34 relay: Makowske . <br /> 35 <br /> 36 Motion carried <br /> 37 <br /> 38 Bernhard Preussner asked what the penalty is for an <br /> 39 unlicensed dog, and Mr . Soth replied that as a misdemeanor <br /> 40 it carries a penalty of up to 90 days in jail or a $700 <br /> 41 fine . <br /> 42 <br /> 43 Council Member Marks commented that at the last Council <br /> 44 meeting a statement was made concerning the large number of <br /> 45 unlicensed dogs in St . Anthony but that he personally is <br /> 46 unaware of such a situation. Mr. Preussner stated that he <br /> 47 estimates there are at least 500 dogs in St . Anthony but <br /> 48 that fewer than 100 are actually licensed . Mayor Pro Tem <br /> 49 Ranallo remarked that at the last Council meeting it was <br /> 50 decided that the dog ordinance should be studied . He asked <br />