|
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes
<br /> March 28, 1995
<br /> Page 3
<br /> 1 VI. PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS.
<br /> 2 Motion by Enrooth, second by Wagner to approve the following claims:
<br /> 3 A. North Suburban Cable Commission, in the amount of$9,265.50 for 1995 contribution.
<br /> 4 B. Midwest Asphalt, Inc., in the amount of$12,585.28 for 1994 Street and Watermain
<br /> 5 improvements.
<br /> 6 C. Springsted, Inc., in the amount of$10,712.16 for services preliminary to the issuance of
<br /> 7 $825,000 General Obligation Improvement Bonds, Series 1995A.
<br /> 8 D. Northwest Banks, in the amount of$1,172.50 for debt service payment for sewer revision
<br /> 9 October 1, 1988.
<br /> 10 E. Moody's Investors Service, in the amount of$3,000.00 for professional services rendered
<br /> 11 for $825,000 General Obligation Bonds.
<br /> 12 F. Dorsey & Whitney, in the amount of$583.30 for legal services rendered through January
<br /> 13 31, 1995 regarding Coolidge Residential Lots and $2,929.74 for professional services
<br /> 14 rendered through January 31, 1995 for general matters.
<br /> 15 G. Hance, Iverson, Zappia. LeVahn, Berndt, & Desmond, Ltd., in the amount of$2,400.00,
<br /> 16 $2,400.00, and $2,400.00 for legal services rendered for the months of January, February,
<br /> . 17 and March of 1995.
<br /> 18 H. 5 pages of Verified Claims as presented by the Finance Director.
<br /> •9 Motion carried unanimously.
<br /> 20 VII. REPORTS.
<br /> 21 A. Planning Commission March 21, 1995.
<br /> 22 1. Myers Tire Supply, 3839 Chandler Drive - Setback Variance Request
<br /> 23 Commissioner Makowske reported there was one item that required action at the
<br /> 24 Planning Commission meeting of March 21, 1995. He stated there was a setback
<br /> 25 variance request made for Myers Tire Supply, 3839 Chandler Drive. He indicated this lot
<br /> 26 had an unusual shape. He stated the lot was zoned light-industrial and a residentiallot
<br /> 27 abutted the back of the property. He indicated Mr. Dane Teaman had requested the
<br /> 28 setback variance and had indicated that when he fust moved in to the property, there were
<br /> 29 unclarified notions as to what the fire code required for storage of his products. After he
<br /> 30 was moved in, the Fire Department informed Mr. Teaman that he was required to have
<br /> 31 special storage areas for his products. He either would need two foot by three foot rooms
<br /> 32 with special doors and walls for inside storage or he would need to store the products
<br /> 33 outdoors. Mr. Teaman then purchased an 8' by 8' storage shed to store the product, and
<br /> 34 placed it outdoors, next to the loading dock, one foot from the property line. The
<br /> 35 building inspector then informed Mr. Teaman that the shed was in violation of the
<br /> 36 setback code, as it had to be placed three feet from the property line. Makowske reported
<br /> R7 that Management Assistant, Kim Moore-Sykes, had walked the site and reported there
<br /> 8 was no place the shed could be positioned on the property that would not require a
<br /> 39 variance. Management Assistant Moore-Sykes recommended approval of the variance
<br /> 40 request due to the unusual situation, as there was no other place the shed could be located
<br />
|