My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 10141997
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1997
>
CC MINUTES 10141997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:56:44 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:56:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1997
SP Name
CC MINUTES 10141997
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> October 14, 1997 <br /> • Page 11 <br /> 1 of storm water is different. All three properties in that area have walk-outs at a low elevation <br /> 2 with adjacent catch basins. The flood water was three feet at the highest point on the <br /> 3 foundation was adjacent. It is possible that the flood proofing of all three homes and <br /> 4 regrading the backyards areas, could solve the flooding problem. He noted that the water <br /> 5 does not stand long in this area. Even after the July 1 storm the water was down in less than <br /> 6 two hours. <br /> 7 Ms. Higgins stated that she felt that there was a bigger problem on St. Anthony Boulevard <br /> 8 and that even the reduction of one home would help. <br /> 9 Mr. Hubmer stated there is also an economic side to this. It may be possible to provide <br /> 10 protection at less of a cost than purchasing the home. He also noted that the two lots together <br /> 11 are only 3/4 of an acre at the most and to provide the necessary holding pond on that size lot <br /> 12 it would have to be 140 feet deep. This would not be reasonable at this location. <br /> 13 Ms. Higgins stated that St. Anthony Boulevard is a beautiful street and an asset to the City. <br /> 14 She felt that a holding pond may distract from that but that it could possibly be landscaped. <br /> 15 She did not necessarily want a big holding pond next to her home but felt that removing the <br /> 16 Lockrem home and providing the additional green space would help the situation. <br /> Mr. Hubmer stated he did not believe that the removal of a single home would prevent the <br /> 8 inundation of other homes. Most of the water in the St. Anthony Boulevard area comes in <br /> 19 from another area. If the house is removed the only water removed would be that coming <br /> 20 from the roof and the driveway. <br /> 21 Marks noted that at one time that area on St. Anthony Boulevard was swamps and <br /> 22 marshlands. He asked if the water table being high in that area could be a contributing factor. <br /> 23 Mr. Hubmer noted that some resident's pumps on W. Armour Terrace are operating <br /> 24 continuously. He stated this could have an impact but he did not know to what extent. <br /> 25 John Kuharski, 2709 Pahl Avenue, stated he felt that the short-term solutions were being <br /> 26 combined with the long-term solutions. The Task Force's idea to buy-out the homes was a <br /> 27 short-term solution. This would not solve the problem but would help residents to not get <br /> 28 water in their basements. He stated that if the water had been another two inches lower he <br /> 29 would not have gotten water in his basement. He stated that Mr. Willenbring has stated that <br /> 30 he received all his information from the survey but the owner of the house at 2709 Armour <br /> 31 Terrace has stated that she never received a survey. The Task Force considered the home at <br /> 32 3503 Edward Street as the sixth house on their list of buy-outs because this was the first <br /> 33 occurrence of flooding to that property. Mr. Kuharski stated that on September 10, at the <br /> 34 Task Force meeting, he asked if the City could reimburse residents for damage to their home <br /> 35 due to water being stored on public property. He still has not received an answer. <br /> 56 Morrison stated that this issue was answered on Page 10 of the City's report. The City does <br /> 37 not have the discretion to reimburse residents for damage to their property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.