My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 01271998
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
1998
>
CC MINUTES 01271998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:49:51 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 1998
SP Name
CC MINUTES 01271998
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • January 27, 1998 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 2 VII. REPORTS. <br /> 3 A. Planning Commission - January 20. 1998. <br /> 4 1. Tony Farald; for Smart Stop, 3259 Stinson Boulevard, Request for a Sideyard <br /> 5 Setback Variance. <br /> 6 Planning Commissioner Jim Gondorchin was present to report on the issues addressed at the <br /> 7 January 20, 1998, Planning Commission Meeting. <br /> 8 Commissioner Gondorchin reported that Tony Farald, owner of the Conoco gas and convenience <br /> 9 store at 3259 Stinson Boulevard is requesting a six foot sideyard setback variance in order to put <br /> 10 a roof and door on an enclosure that is attached to the principal structure. This enclosure is <br /> 11 currently used to store recyclable items and milk crates but is outside and has been subject to <br /> 12 vandalism. The proposed change will eliminate a public health and safety hazard. <br /> 13 Commissioner Gondorchin reported that the proposal had been before the Commission <br /> 14 previously for a concept review and had been well received. The Planning Commission <br /> 15 recommended approval of the sideyard setback based on the following hardship: <br /> 1. The current structure is a legal non-conforming structure which was in place when the <br /> City's Zoning Ordinance was codified in 1976 and that the imposition of that City <br /> 18 Ordinance restricted the ability of this grandfathered structure to make any adequate <br /> 19 improvements for the purpose of public health and safety; <br /> 20 2. It was indeed the City Ordinance that imposed the hardship; and <br /> 21 3. The property is unique in so far as the structure was already in place when the City <br /> 22 Ordinance went into effect. <br /> 23 Commissioner Gondorchin also noted that the proposal will not alter the character of the <br /> 24 neighborhood and is not based solely on economic considerations. <br /> 25 Marks asked if there was any verbiage in the City Code to address structures which were <br /> 26 grandfathered in. <br /> 27 Morrison stated it is generally the opinion of the City Attorney that once a structure is changed in <br /> 28 shape or form, it loses its grandfather status and is subject to current codes. <br /> 29 Motion by Thuesen, second by Faust to approve the six foot sideyard setback variance for the <br /> 30 property located at 3259 Stinson Boulevard based on the findings of the Planning Commission. <br /> 31 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> 0 2. . Alan Chazin, for 3301 Stinson Boulevard(old Clark Station); Request for Property <br /> 33 Subdivision. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.