Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> February 8, 2000 <br /> • <br /> Page 7 <br /> 1 Mr. Thistle responded that question would have to be answered by City Attorney William Soth, <br /> 2 but he initially would believe that the referendum would be placed on a regular Election Day <br /> 3 ballot. <br /> 4 Horst stated that he is curious about the time frame the Council is working with to present the <br /> 5 referendum concept to the public. His concern, he stated, is that the project's cost would con- <br /> 6 tinue to rise as funding decisions were made. <br /> 7 Mr. Thistle stated that Horst raised an excellent point and that timing become critical when re- <br /> 8 lated to funding. <br /> 9 Mr. Thistle wished to provide a recap of the funding for the public works building. He stated it <br /> 10 basically comes down to two options: referendum or lease revenue options. The referendum dis- <br /> t I tributes the taxes against the single-family home and there is the potential for the public not to <br /> 12 support such a proposal; but the lease revenue option is more expensive. For clarification, he di- <br /> 13 rected the Council's attention to page 41 of the Report. <br /> 14 Cavanaugh suggested that City Manager Michael Momson coordinate with Mr. Thistle and City <br /> Finance Director Roger Larson to develop a presentation on the infiltration funds and the issues <br /> 6 involved in restructuring, as well as a time frame in working through those issues. <br /> 17 In proceeding through the report, Mr. Thistle brought up the issue of a potential new fire station. <br /> 18 He suggested the possibility of putting the two projects (public works building and fire station) <br /> 19 together into a single issue (referendum or lease revenue bonds). <br /> 20 On an unrelated subject, Mr. Thistle spoke about the City's interest in the Salvation Army prop- <br /> 21 erty. To sum it up, Mr. Thistle stated, the property is too expensive and should not be considered <br /> 22 by the City for a potential purchase. <br /> 23 Mr. Thistle stated that the largest project the City is currently involved in is the flood mitigation <br /> 24 and street reconstruction. He directed the Council's attention to page 36 of the Springsted Report <br /> 25 which explained in detail the funding sources in place for the project. In short, based on the <br /> 26 information provided by Todd Hubmer of WSB & Associate,the City has plans to use a mix of <br /> 27 payment sources including: (1) intergovernmental sources such as Minnesota State Street Aid <br /> 28 (MSA funds); (2) Federal Emergency Management Assistance (FEMA); (3) Hennepin County <br /> 29 and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR); (4) grants; and (5) other sources such <br /> 30 as bonding, assessments, current balances, and storm water fees. <br /> 31 Mornson explained for the new Councilmembers that the page Mr. Thistle was referring to that <br /> set forth dollar figures for the fund sources would be revised to provide current figures. In that <br /> respect, Morrison specifically reviewed the funding sources and provided a background of infor- <br />