CC MINUTES 06272000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Regular Meeting Minutes June 27, 2000 • Page 9 1 Various discussion ensued between the Councilmembers, Mr. Shardlow and Mr. 2 Bergstrom regarding possible restrictions for the plan and/or the best plan for the City to 3 consider. 4 Mr. Shardlow said an idea would be to specify some uses as conditional uses. Hillcrest 5 would like to structure an approval and go forward with that approval to fill the building 6 with tenants. 7 Cavanaugh inquired about the time consequences ifahis issue.was returned to..the 8 Planning Commission for further review. City Manager Morrison stated that it would 9 delay the issue from 2-4 weeks, but it would still be possible to accomplish the goals 10 already set. The issue would return to the Planning Commission meeting on July 18, 11 2000, and would then be passed back to the City Council at a Council meeting after that 12 date. 13 Anthony Gleekel, attorney for Hillcrest Development, approached the Council. He stated 14 that he understood the Council's concerns and expressed Hillcrest Development's position. 15 on the issue. Additionally, he stated that the plan in question was not intended to be final 6 because there are many issues left to be studied and resolved. Additionally, Hillcrest's goal is to present a final approval, along with a specific PUD agreement. Mr. Gleekel 18 explained that Hillcrest would be targeting office-high tech tenants; however, Hillcrest 19 would like the opportunity to be flexible in their tenant base. Additionally, conditions 20 could be placed regarding the details of the exterior of the building if certain types of 21 tenants, such as warehouse/manufacturing, were obtained. 22 Cavanaugh suggested finalizing the discussions at the Council meeting today in a 23 document so that some definition could be obtained regarding the feelings of the 24 Councilmembers. 25 Cavanaugh asked Mr. Shardlow his opinion about sending this issue back to Planning 26 Commission. Mr. Shardlow stated that whether it is sent back or not,the same language 27 needs to be incorporated into the document. In essence, he would support sending the 28 issue back to the Planning Commission. 29 The consensus of the Council was that the issue should be returned to the Planning 30 Commission for further review and consideration. 31 Cavanaugh directed City Manager Michael Mornson to manage the process of getting the 32 issue returned to the Planning Session, as well as institute a work session for the Council, 33 if necessary. •