My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC MINUTES 08082000
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000
>
CC MINUTES 08082000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 4:42:15 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 4:42:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
19
SP Folder Name
CC MINUTES AND AGENDAS 2000
SP Name
CC MINUTES 08082000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> • August 8, 2000 <br /> Page 4 <br /> 1 Significant discussion ensued between Cavanaugh, Mr. Shardlow and Mr. Soth regarding the <br /> 2 specifics of the proposed plan and various opinions and thoughts were expressed. <br /> 3 When asked for a professional opinion on the redevelopment, Mr. Shardlow stated that he felt <br /> 4 that Hillcrest Development would entice the type of tenant that the City would be proud of, and <br /> 5 that Hillcrest has proven itself with other projects. Mr. Shardlow felt that Hillcrest Development <br /> 6 would create an asset to the community and obstacles would be few as far as the City working <br /> 7 with Hillcrest. <br /> 8 Thuesen recapped that the City needs to determine where it should go with respect to the PUD. <br /> 9 Thuesen felt that the City needed to be fair and come to an agreement and decide if the City is <br /> 10 comfortable with Hillcrest working,on'the Apache property. Additionally, Thuesen pointed out <br /> 11 that there are financial incentives for both the City and for Hillcrest to make this project <br /> 12 profitable. If the City decides not to work with Hillcrest,then this same issue would need to be <br /> 13 revisited in the future with another developer, if the City were able to attract another developer. <br /> 14 Horst responded about a prior comment regarding the importance of the issue being brought <br /> 15 before the Planning Commission. Horst wished to clarify that the Planning Commission was <br /> 16 entrusted to take comments from the community and to obtain a reaction from the community. <br /> 17 Then, a strong recommendation would be made to the Council from the Planning Commission. <br /> The reason, Horst stated, is that the Planning Commission is the advisory group to the Council, <br /> 0 and it is that Commission's job to review any issues and then make recommendations to the <br /> 20 Council. Horst further clarified that the Planning Commission had already asked many of the <br /> 21 questions asked at this meeting tonight, and that the Commission has researched and reviewed <br /> 22 the issues recommended to the Council. <br /> 23 Cavanaugh introduced Chris Melsha, Planning Commissioner, and invited him to address the <br /> 24 Council. Mr. Melsha stated that it was the consensus of the Commission that it was comfortable <br /> 25 with the Plan. Even if it was not the perfect plan for the City, it was a very good plan and it <br /> 26 would be a great improvement over what is currently at that location. Mr. Melsha stated that it <br /> 27 was the consensus that the Commission was comfortable with the project moving away from the <br /> 28 retail sector. <br /> 29 Mr. Melsha read for the Council the findings of fact that the Planning Commission listed as part <br /> 30 of the approval of the plan. These findings were depicted on page 10 of the Planning <br /> 31 Commission Meeting Minutes of August 1, 2000, as well as on page 34 of the Council's meeting <br /> 32 agenda packets. <br /> 33 Mr. Melsha stated that through the almost nine months of hearing from Hillcrest Development <br /> 34 and reviewing the plans and the project, that the Commission was comfortable with the <br /> 35 assurances received from Hillcrest. Additionally, Mr. Melsha pointed out that the Planning <br /> 36 Commission toured many of Hillcrest's renovated sites, and the Commission was impressed with <br /> the quality of work that Hillcrest performed and the appearances of the buildings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.