Laserfiche WebLink
4- <br /> equipment for Well #5 and he told Councilman Marks there was really • <br /> no difference in equipment which had been bid by the two companies , <br /> and he was , therefore , recommending the acceptance of the lowest bid. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Enrooth to <br /> accept the low bid- of $1 , 180 and -award the contract for a chlorinator <br /> for Well #5 to the Layne Minnesota Company . <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Copies of the April 24th letter from Duane G. Googins , Director of <br /> Special Education for District #282 , in which he sought Council <br /> support of the school ' s application for a $2 , 000 juvenile delinquency <br /> prevention grant for the 1983-84 school year had been distributed <br /> and Mr. Googins , who was present, told the Council members there would <br /> be no future financial obligation for either the City or School <br /> District to continue the School Awareness program, if the grant is <br /> funded. He told the Council the program should be separate , but <br /> coordinated with the services of the Youth Bureau counselor, which <br /> is also City supported. <br /> Motion by Councilman Marks and seconded by Councilman Ranallo to <br /> authorize the City ' s . sponsorship of District #282 '.s.- application <br /> for a $2 ,000 Minnesota Energy and Economic Development Justice <br /> Grant , as requested by the School District. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Councilmen Marks and Makowske had requested a reconsideration of that <br /> portion of the City ' s ordinance dealing with parks which allowed the <br /> issuance of temporary permits for the consumption of 3. 2 beer during <br /> Community Services approved games and special community and family <br /> affairs held in the City parks. The Manager reported the results <br /> . of a survey he had made of the manner in which the use of alcohol . <br /> is dealt with in other municipalities and he and Councilman Ranallo <br /> gave the historical background of the use of these permits had <br /> evolved in the City since 1973 . Mr. Hamer indicated it had been his <br /> understanding that past City Councils had concluded the best way <br /> of controlling the debris left behind after softball tournaments was <br /> to charge a $50 cleanup deposit which would be forfeited if the <br /> debris were not completely removed from the parks after each event. <br /> The Public Works Director indicated he perceived the age and resi- <br /> dent stipulations had much to do with compliance with the ordinance. <br /> Mayor Sundland said the understanding on the Council had always been <br /> that the permits would be abolished immediately if there were any <br /> serious problems and they had always recognized the reality that <br /> there would always be some drinking in the park whether the City had <br /> an ordinance or not, and that the permits at least gave the City <br /> some control over the manner ,in which that was done. The Mayor then <br /> pointed out that the Community '.Services would not reissue a ,.permit <br /> to-any group which misused their park privileges .. _ Mr. Childs said <br /> the Police Department gets -a copy of each permit which is issued and <br /> he is certain they keep a close -watch on each of these events and - <br /> would certainly be requesting the abolition of the permits if they <br /> perceive the drinking of beer posed a serious problem for them. The <br /> only complaints from neighbors about park activities anyone could <br />