My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 06261984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 06261984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:57:32 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:57:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 06261984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST.. ANTHONY <br /> REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL ACTION <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> Date Submitted Type of Action Requested Agenda 'Item< Number <br /> Resolution <br /> July 6, 1984 Ordinance <br /> Date Action Requested Formal Action/Motion Title Gross Golf <br /> - - Other <br /> July 10 , 1984 Course - Water/Sewer <br /> Hookuns <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> TO: Mayor and Councilmen <br /> FROM: David Childs , City Manager <br /> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ <br /> SUMMARY DISCUSSION OF SUBJECT: <br /> The Mayor and City Manager met with 'the Chairman and Executive <br /> Director of the Minneapolis Park and .Recreation Board regarding <br /> their participation in the reconstruction of-St. Anthony Blvd. <br /> adjacent to their property . At the meeting they produc6d the <br /> attached agreement signed by them and St. Anthony Village nearly <br /> s twenty years ago which, among other points , provides that they will <br /> not be assessed for improvements without their permission. In short, <br /> s' they refuse to give their permission or to participate in any way <br /> in the maintenance of the roadway . They cite lack of funds and <br /> unwillingness to establish a bad precedent as their reason for <br /> refusal . <br /> FISCAL IMPACT: <br /> The agreement prohibits the City from allowing trade traffic and <br /> MSA funds require truck traffic to be allowed so currently MSA does <br /> not appear to be a possible funding source. <br /> ALTERNATIVES : <br /> If the City does not grant approval, the Park Board will connect <br /> l to our utilities ; therefore the thought of withholding approval <br /> as a lever to gain their cooperation on the road improvement project <br /> appears totally unworkable. <br />' RECOMMENDATION: <br /> Y <br /> Staff recommends that <br /> 1, Approval be granted for them to install utilities as requested <br /> 2 . , The street be patched and staff instructed to investigate <br /> future funding sources for road reconstruction. <br /> 1 <br /> • <br /> CIW MA AGER'S REVIEW: COMMENTS : <br /> K� <br /> Y <br /> 1, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.