My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC PACKET 07101984
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
1984
>
CC PACKET 07101984
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:57:38 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:57:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
16
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 1981-1984 & 1987
SP Name
CC PACKET 07101984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(e) At the close of the hearings end within thirty (30) days, the order the arbitration procedure repeated and issue findings, <br /> arbitrators shall prepare written findings and made a written orders and directions, with costs of suit to be awarded to <br /> decision agreed upon by a majority of the arbitrators which the prevailing party, <br /> shall be served by mail upon City and Grantee. (j) Coat of arbitration shall be borne equally. Reasonable <br /> (f) The decision of a majority of the arbitrators shall be attorneys' fees shall be borne by the party who retains an <br /> binding upon both parties, provided that either party may attorney. <br /> I <br /> pursue any judicial remedies otherwise available to either <br /> party. <br /> (g) Should the rate change be rejected or modified by a majority <br /> of the arbitrators, the Grantee shall within ninety (90) days <br /> t <br /> and pursuant to procedures established by Grantee refund the F <br /> a <br /> rate overage to affected subscribers. <br /> (h) Either party may also seek judicial relief to the extent <br /> authorized under Minnesota Statutes, 5572.09 and 5572.19 as <br /> the same may be amended, and in addition, under the following i <br /> circumstances: <br /> (i) A party fails to select an arbitrator; <br /> (ii) The arbitrators fails to select a third arbitrator; <br /> (iii) one or more arbitrator is unqualified; <br /> (iv) Designated time limits have been exceeded; <br /> (v) The arbitrators have not proceeded expeditiously; or <br /> (vi) Based upon the record the arbitrators abused their <br /> discretion. <br /> (i) in the event a Cart of competent jurisdiction determines the <br /> arbitrators have abused their discretion, or that the regula- <br /> tion of a given rate is beyad the authority of City, it may <br /> A-12 <br /> A-11 <br /> E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.