My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RES 81-024 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD AND THE COMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF RAILROAD CORSSING SIGNALS
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
1981
>
RES 81-024 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD AND THE COMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF RAILROAD CORSSING SIGNALS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:07:16 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:07:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
23
SP Folder Name
RES 1981
SP Name
RES 81-024 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WITH SOO LINE RAILROAD AND THE COMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF RAILROAD CORSSING SIGNALS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGREEMENT N0. 60349 <br /> iPortion of costs allocated to <br /> Columbia Heights (50 of <br /> actual cost) $ 3,330.15 <br /> Portion of costs allocated to <br /> St. Anthony (50 of actual <br /> cost) $ 3,330.15 <br /> Reimbursable with <br /> Federal Funds $59,942.70 <br /> 4. In the event it is determined that a change from the foregoing <br /> statement of work to be performed by the Company is required, it shall be <br /> authorized only by a written change or extra work order issued by the State <br /> prior to the performance of the work involved in .the change. <br /> S. The said grade crossing signal system shall be maintained and operated <br /> by the Company upon completion of its installation, but this said obligation <br /> to maintain said signal system shall continue in accordance with the law of <br /> the State as it shall be from time to time in the future. <br /> 6. The signal system shall not be removed unless there has been a <br /> determination that said signals &,re no longer required at this location. If <br /> the signals are to be removed, the Company upon request of the State shall <br /> reinstall it at some other crossing within the State on the Company's tracks. <br /> The location and division of cost of such relocation shall be agreed upon <br /> between the Company and the State prior to such removal. <br /> In the event that either railway or highway improvements will necessitate <br /> a rearrangement of the signals at said crossing, the party whose improvement <br /> causes said changes will bear the entire cost of the same without obligation <br /> to the other. <br /> �3 <br /> -. 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.