Laserfiche WebLink
• RESOLUTION 84-022 <br /> A RESOLUTION OPPOSING ANY AND ALL MINNESOTA STATE LEGISLATION <br /> WHICH WOULD PERMIT THE SALE OF WINE IN GROCERY STORES <br /> WHEREAS, the City of St. Anthony opposes legislation which would <br /> reduce our ability to control properly the dispensation of alcohol in <br /> our community. Our voters have made the decision that the City will <br /> have complete control of both on-sale and off-sale liquor establish- <br /> ments and our record in terms of sales to minors , dramshop claims and <br /> alcohol related problems in our community is excellent. The City 's <br /> interest in alcohol and drug abuse extends to joint funding with the <br /> local school district of our Chemical Abuse Advisory Committee which <br /> has made excellent progress within the community in its efforts to <br /> educate youth about the dangers of drugs and alcohol and adults con- <br /> cerning responsible use of alcoholic beverages . <br /> Other concerns we have about the pending legislation include: <br /> 1. State-wide public hearings gave this issue a strong look <br /> two years ago and it met thundering defeat; <br /> 2 . Proper public policy does not support a 300%-500% increase <br /> in the number of outlets for off-sale wine in our state. <br /> Distribution studies from across the nation clearly demon- <br /> strate that as the number of outlets increase, CONTROL DECREASES; <br /> 3. Studies from states that now have wine in grocery stores <br /> clearly show that the teenage employees -of convenience stores <br /> do not strongly resist underage sales . Indeed, those states <br /> have high DWI involvement among young people and are the <br /> states seeking to raise minimum drinking ages; <br /> 4 . Only 4 states that allow wine in grocery stores have <br /> resisted efforts to also permit spirits in grocery stores; <br /> 5. Tax revenues would not increase since our wine taxes in <br /> Minnesota are among the lowest in the nation. Thus , replacing i <br /> beer or spirit sales with wine sales would not benefit state <br /> tax coffers. . .unless , of course, overall consumption were <br /> to expand dramatically. Such an expansion would be in <br /> marked contrast to present public policy . Furthermore , the <br /> destruction of municipal liquor stores would place a severe i <br /> strain on local tax budgets ; <br /> 6. Wine in grocery stores would mainly benefit the large chain <br /> stores who account for about 70% of sales while driving <br /> hundreds of small municipal and private retailers out of <br /> business with a net loss of jobs to Minnesotans; and <br /> 7. Consumers would suffer a sharp decline in the number of <br /> Is wines available and most wines will sharply appreciate in <br /> price to cover sales declines , especially higher quality <br /> wines which are now "underwritten" by the popular brands <br /> that would be used as "loss leaders" in the grocery adver- <br /> tisements. j <br />