My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC WORKSESSION 12062001
StAnthony
>
City Council
>
City Council Work Session
>
2001
>
CC WORKSESSION 12062001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 7:54:36 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 7:54:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
29
SP Folder Name
CC PACKETS 2001-2004
SP Name
CC WORKSESSION 12062001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
with the financial gap. They brought a talented and experienced team to the project. <br /> They demonstrated substantial urban design experience and great sensitivity. <br /> Of all of the candidate teams,they clearly have identified the development and <br /> management of"urban villages"as a market focus and they have the will and resources <br /> to see that objective through to completion. They are clearly one of the top contenders. <br /> 3. La Nel Financial Groun <br /> This group is clearly focused on the senior housing component. They would conform to <br /> design themes and standards established by the master developer or city. Some of their <br /> existing product is of a more suburban style than the concept plan would indicate, but <br /> again, I am confident that they could conform to a broader design framework. <br /> 4. Onus <br /> This group is clearly another top contender. They have obviously made a significant <br /> commitment to urban housing styles and they see redevelopment as an important market <br /> niche for the future. Excellent urban design and planning skills were evident both in their <br /> proposal and references to past and current projects. <br /> 5. Pratt-Ordway LLC <br /> The team architect showed a number of very positive examples of urban housing projects. <br /> Pratt has an extensive track record in delivering townhouse communities to market <br /> successfully and could perform well in the project. They missed the mark on the office <br /> and commercial component of the development. Their idea of single story, office <br /> buildings that appear residential in character, is not appropriate in this project. <br /> 6. Sherman Associates, Inc. <br /> This team demonstrated excellent design capability. Current and recent examples of <br /> work demonstrate excellent urban design and market savvy. They are also among the top <br /> candidates for this project. <br /> 7. Told <br /> They demonstrated the results of their learning experience in St. Louis Park. Their <br /> architects showed great building ideas for the multiple products, with the"mansion style" <br /> presenting an image that would go a long way toward alleviating community concerns. <br /> They clearly understand the context and the challenges and should be considered among <br /> the top contenders for the development. <br /> From the Desk of.... <br /> John W.Shardlow • President • 300 1 u Ave.N. • Suite 210 • Minneapolis.,MN 55401 <br /> 612-339-3300 0 fax-612-337-5601 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.