Laserfiche WebLink
1 logo on a mural so close to this sign might be perceived to be <br /> 2 "overdoing it" . The consensus of the Commission was that there was <br /> 3 little or no support for a logo. <br /> 4 Commissioners London and Werenicz are against a mural. Commissioners <br /> 5 Madden, Wagner, Franzese and Brownell are more in favor of a mural <br /> 6 and Commissioner Hansen might be in favor, but absolutely not with a <br /> 7 logo. <br /> 8 ACTION ITEMS <br /> 9 PUBLIC Ea ARINGS <br /> 10 Commissioners Like New Rapid Oil Plans <br /> 11 At 8:25 P.M. the Chair read aloud the Notice of the Hearing to <br /> 12 consider the variance request from Rapid Oil for 3 wall signs to be <br /> 13 erected on the new building the company proposes to construct on <br /> 14 their property at 3701 Silver Lake Road. No one present reported <br /> 15 failure to receive the notice which had been published in the June <br /> 16 8th Bulletin and sent to all property owners of record within 200 <br /> 17 feet of the subject property nor did anyone object to its content. <br /> 18 Application for: <br /> 19 2 wall signs of 27 .5 square feet each, one facing southeast and the <br /> 20 other facing northwest; <br /> 21 1 wall sign of 33 square feet facing the southwest; <br /> 22 total signage of 87.5 square feet where the Sign Ordinance only <br /> 23 allows 1 wall sign totalling 80 square feet. <br /> 24 Staff Repot: <br /> 25 *Childs reiterated information contained in his June 16th <br /> 26 memorandum, including the change in plans to construct a new building <br /> 27 rather than to remodel the old one; <br /> 28 *indicated that because of the site restraints from the <br /> 29 drop off towards the NSP substation to the north and loss of 17 feet <br /> 30 of. land on the south to the County Road D reconstruction project, <br /> 31 and the need for better traffic flow for their operation, Rapid Oil <br /> 32 had decided to angle the new building in such a manner that they now <br /> 33 perceived they needed signage on three sides; <br /> 34 *perceived there might be justification for granting a <br /> 35 variance for a third sign because of these restraints and because the <br /> 36 City has traditionally allowed two signs on a corner; <br /> 37 <br /> 5 <br />