PL AGENDA 06211988 (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 *stated that although he was usually "really tough" , 2 when it came to signage he perceived they had made a good case for 3 being allowed three rather than the two signs the City usually 4 allows a corner lot; 5 *concluded by saying he believed that by squaring off 6 this building for two signs, the City would lose something. 7 *Wagner agreed that this parcel with the NSP distribution 8 center behind it was unique and needed three signs for 9 identification. 10 *Franzese questioned the need for 3 signs, however she 11 said she liked the symmetry of 3 signs on the building; 12 *agreed that the unique topography of the site and the 13 need for better traffic flow provided the justification for the 14 variances in this case. 15 *Werenicz indicated he was pleased with the overall 16 concept and believed by angling the building the need had been 17 created for three. signs; 18 *perceived all any driver approaching the facility from 19 any one direction would see would be only one sign; 20 *thought the 7-1/2 square foot total size variance was 21 minimal after taking into account that the signs are mass produced to 22 the same sizes. 23 *Madden agreed that angling the building necessitated 24 three signs. 25 *London thought this would be an attractive facility for 26 that unique corner and that the variance requests were quite 27 reasonable; 28 *said he was "very much in favor" of granting the 29 variances. 30 *Brownell echoed .what the other Commissioners had said, 31 indicating he perceived this would be an attractive use of a 32 difficult corner; 33 *agreed that three signs were justified because of the 34 location of the building and the traffic patterns. 35 When he had ascertained that there were no persons present who 36 objected to the variances, the Chair closed the hearing at 8:50 P.M. 37 for the following: 7