My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL AGENDA 11151988 (2)
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Agendas
>
1988
>
PL AGENDA 11151988 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:13:26 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:13:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL AGENDA 11151988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3 <br /> Staff Report <br /> 2 In his November 9th memorandum, Mr. Childs had reported the City's <br /> 3 policy of allowing a square footage bonus if the sign is shorter than <br /> 4 five feet, which was not true in this case. He had also indicated that <br /> 5 the ordinance allowed a sign to be as tall as 8 feet if it is landscaped <br /> 6 but said this would not allow the sign copy to be larger than 32 <br /> 7 square feet. The City Manager had also given arguments both for and <br /> 8 against the variance saying there might be justification for granting <br /> 9 the variance because of the building's location and size, which could <br /> 10 potentially result in several tenants needing identification. The City <br /> 11 Manager could perceive no hardship because the ordinance allows one <br /> 12 wall sign up to 150 square feet for each tenant and the height of the <br /> 13 building and its configuration would make such wall signs very visible. <br /> 14 The memorandum suggested a compromise variance might be worked out with <br /> 15 the applicants whereby a smaller ground sign could be granted in lieu <br /> 16 of wall signs of the size permitted each tenant. <br /> 17 Proponent - Charles Youngquist of R. L. Johnson Co. <br /> 18 The management company representative responded to the staff memorandum <br /> 19 by saying there were almost two separate buildings in that structure <br /> 20 with a medical administrative services -company, StrategiCare, Inc. <br /> 21 utilizing all the space in the tower section and his firm expecting <br /> 22 to lease the south wing to possibly four other companies which made <br /> medical devices in the labs Medtronics left behind. He argued that a <br /> sign as large as his company had proposed would be necessary to carry <br /> 25 copy identifying StrategiCare, Inc. and the four tenants as well as the <br /> 26 building name and the name of his firm with its telephone number. Mr. <br /> 27 Youngquist said he doubted the 4 X 4 foot sign the City allowed could <br /> 28 ever carry all that copy and still be read at speeds of 55 miles an hour <br /> 29 from Highway 88, which is at least 40 feet away from the building. He <br /> 30 also: <br /> 31 *conceded that Commissioner Hansen had been right when he said were <br /> 32 not "drive-by businesses like McDonald's, etc. " , but rather that the <br /> 33 primary amount of traffic would be either clients or delivery truck <br /> 34 drivers, who although they might never have been there before, knew <br /> 35 pretty much the location and type of building they were looking for; <br /> 36 *told Commissioner Hansen the size of the sign had been based on the <br /> 37 sign company's previous experience with the size required for this much <br /> 38 copy and the speeds of drivers expected to be looking for the building. <br /> 39 He indicated the StrategiCare logo dictated some of the size and said <br /> 40 because his company is located in Golden Valley, they perceived a <br /> 41 need for the manager's name and phone number on the copy; <br /> 42 *indicated Johnson Investment had concluded it was better to carry all <br /> 43 the names on the sign rather than to have them plastered all over the <br /> 44 building; <br /> 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.