Laserfiche WebLink
6 <br /> 1 options weren't possible and wanted the request tabled until that was <br /> •2 accomplished. <br /> 3 Commissioner Madden said he thought the sign which had been proposed was <br /> 4 too large and too high. He agreed that the sketch which the proponents <br /> 5 had submitted should have indicated the location of the roadway and the <br /> 6 right-of-way in relation to the sign, but thought a reasonable <br /> 7 compromise would be in order for the City to get monument rather than <br /> 8 wall signage. He suggested "a more subtle approach with a reduced <br /> 9 size combined with berming would be a better_ way to go" , and suggested <br /> 10 the way to accomplish that might be for the Johnson Investment Co. <br /> 11 staff to sit down with City staff to try to work out signage which would <br /> 12 be more palatable to the rest of the Commissioners. <br /> 13 Chair Wagner indicated he also didn't like the size of the sign and <br /> 14 thought a compromise should be worked out with staff. <br /> 15 Commission Action <br /> 16 Motion by Madden, seconded by Brownell to defer action on the Johnson <br /> 17 Investment Co. request for a month and to return the proposal to staff <br /> 18 for a conference with the applicant to provide additional information <br /> 19 and possibly a compromise. <br /> 20 Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Commission Votes 4 to 1 to Recommend Extension of Video Update Permit <br /> Subject to Removal of Lights in Store Window <br /> 23 At 8:25 P.M. the Chair read aloud the Notice of Hearing to consider the <br /> 24 request from Craig Belisle, Video Update, 2510 Kenzie Terrace, for <br /> 25 amendment to the conditional use permit granted February 28, 1984, which <br /> 26 would approve expansion of the existing video tape sales and rental <br /> 27 operation into the adjacent 1 , 200 square feet of retail space vacated <br /> 28 by the Popco Cleaners. The permit would bring the video operation into <br /> 29 conformance with the Zoning code, since the requested expansion was done <br /> 30 without any building permit and without conditional use permit approval <br /> 31 by the City. <br /> 32 Only the applicant was present to discuss the issue. <br /> 33 Staff Report <br /> 34 In his November 9th memorandum, Mr. Childs had advised that Video <br /> 35 ' Update was in violation of the City's sign code regarding flashing <br /> 36 lights and recommended the conditional use permit should be approved <br /> 37 with the same conditions as the original permit but with the added <br /> 38 condition that the flashing lights be removed. He also recommended the <br /> 39 entire conditional use permit be rescinded if the video shop proprietor <br /> 40 does not comply. <br /> 0 <br />