|
�bLl
<br /> The mee�iyig was called '-.c; order C y Che
<br /> The following members were present- :
<br /> Howitz, mocks, Coulter, Mesenbrin�;
<br /> and the followin..o' were absent!
<br /> Emond. Springci.--
<br /> 1. The Board received a petition from Alden i". Nordstrom requesting
<br /> a variance in zoning on that part of the east 60 feet of Lots 8, 9,
<br /> and 10 lying south of the north 1210 feet thereof, T3'.I.ock 7, 14ounds View
<br /> 1.cres Second 1--ddition. The change requested was from R-2 Two Samily
<br /> to 1;iultiple a4elling zoning,,
<br /> Moved by Yesenbring, Beconded by Englund to call a public hearing
<br /> ?:C0 P_1�1.
<br /> to be held all 7bbruar%y 2 7. 1964.
<br /> Four members in favor , one opposed, two absent not voting,
<br /> Eotion carried.
<br /> 2. The Board received a petition from krthiir G. Lowell requesting
<br /> a variance in zoning on Lot 4, Block 4, Clark d. Kings Hennepin Gardens;
<br /> • tract k &. D, Registered land survey -,A063; Part of S 1/3 of 1\5-It of
<br /> SWV' lying 1i of S 258 ft. thereof, Section 6, Twp, 29, Range 23.
<br /> Moved by Rocks, seconded by Coulter to call a public hearing
<br /> to be held at 7:00 P.ivi. February 17, 1964. All in favor. Motion carried.
<br /> 3. Paul Johnson presented a request for a -waiver of minimum frontage
<br /> and minimum area requiremonts on R-2 Two family lot described as Lot 1,
<br /> Block 1, Truchinski addition. The lot is 89,,9 feet in width and contains
<br /> 11,644 square feet. Empire Sales, Inc, p:;.,oposes to construct a double
<br /> bungalow on this lot. According to the survey and proposed location
<br /> off' the proposed structure, it Appears that all of the setback and yard
<br /> requirements can be complied with. It was thereftre: Moved by Rocks,
<br /> seconded by INIesenbring to appro, e the waiver as requested.
<br /> secon r
<br /> favor. Notion
<br /> 4. Wes Robertson presented, proposed plans Mr a 67 unit, multiple
<br /> dwelling comple:, to be constructed 6n-lots 7, 8, 9 and 10. Block 12,
<br /> Mounds View 11--ores Second Addition. The plans as proposed complied
<br /> T-r-ith all ofd the rcquirenonts of Ordinance :.,,66.
<br /> 14oved by Coulter, seconded by Englund to approve proposed complex
<br /> subject to approval of the Village Engineer and BuA.1ding Inspector.
<br /> All in favor. Lotion carried.
<br /> Moved by Coulter, seconded by Rocks to adjoin, 10.1 in favor. Motion
<br /> Ri COI',dv!EIDE,!) COUKTIL &CTION: carr--;ed,,
<br /> • 1. No action
<br /> 2. No action
<br /> 3. k.pprove frontage and area requirement as outl4.ned.
<br /> 4. Approve Dpoposed plans f1or construction of multiple dwelling complex.
<br /> .Stanley Feickart
<br /> Senretary
<br />
|