PL MINUTES 09011964 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Si . :zPITti ;:'f i,.AGE • PLANNING 6(JAI% SPECIAL i4EETI,NG SEPTEMBER 1 , i964 The meeting was called, to order by the acting chairman, Thomas Coutter. Present: Coulter, Emond; Springer, Englund, Sowden Absent: Howi t , r,,esnir;ng The purpose of the :meeting was to hold a public hearing on the Village Council 's consideration to rezone the following described property from commercial to single family res-identia t:. t 1 . Com. at a pt.- In the S 1 i-ne. of Che S!4, 1/4 of NI.1 1 /4 di s ,1,2 .rods E d; Std cor thereof, th N 183 ft to beg.;. - - -- - - - - - th:,E 147 ft th S 15-7, ft th E 222 ft th N to SE cor of Lemke's Second Addition th 14 to Sw cor thereof th S -to Beg. ex streets, Section 6, Township 29, Range- 23. 2. N 431 -7/1.0 ft of S 660 ft of w 12 rods of S11 1./4 of Nh# 1 /4 ex road, Section 6, Township 29, Mange 23. 3• N 49.36 ft of Lot 9 and all of Lots 10-16, -Block 3, Clark & Kings Hennepin Gardens. • 4. Registered Land Survey Noi 196 The hearing was opened and the chairman outlined the rezoning to be considered. The petition from the property owners along Stinson Btvd. between St. Anthony Rd. (vacated) and 33rd Avenue K.E. was read. After a lengthy discussion and hearing all the comments from the floor the hear- ing was closed and Springer introduced the following motion: Moved that the hearing be recessed until October 6, 1964 at which time-the contemplated commercial development by Century Capitol Corporation may be reviewed. In the interim the board may consult with Village Attorney and also examine traffic problems or any other problems relative to such a development. The Motion was- seconded by Sowden. Voting Aye: Springer, Sowden Nay: Coulter, Emond, Englund Motion defeated, Moved by Englund seconded by.,Emond 'to rezone &li of the property as previously described from commercial ,to R-1 single family residential for the following reasons: 1 . The entire area is R-l. single family .residential in character and any • development other than R-1wouldnot be in keeping with the now existing develop- ment. 2. The size of the undeveloped area is -sufticien.t, to permit a feasible and very desirable residential development.