My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 03161976
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1976
>
PL MINUTES 03161976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:19:03 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:19:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 03161976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Page 4 <br /> and whether the safety of pedestrian's no matter what age had been <br /> sufficiently considered, the remainder" of the Board agreed to the <br /> • following which .they intended to serve as a "Motion of Opinion" to <br /> the Council : <br /> Motion by Mr. Marks, seconded by Mr. Johnson to- indicate to the Council <br /> that the Planning Board desires to go on record as feeling the re- <br /> development of the property on the southeast corner of Stinson Blvd. <br /> and .33rd Avenue N.E. with a new Speedy',�Market is desirable without <br /> the dispensing of gas, with .;their opposition to the- gas pumps based <br /> on the following concerns : <br /> 1. Whether the screening of the residences adjacent to the <br /> project will be adequate to deal with the ' increased noise and <br /> intense lighting which would be inherent to such a gas dispensing <br /> operation. <br /> 2. Whether there should be -further traffic generation at a <br /> normally - congested intersection. <br /> 3. Whether the change in traffic patterns might prove hazardous <br /> to the small children who frequent the store. <br /> 4. Whether there is a possibility that the project might <br /> ultimately result in the establishment of a full service gas <br /> station. <br /> • 5. Whether the parking will be adequate to serve the dual <br /> purpose of the proposal. <br /> 6 . Whether there will be adequate stacking spaces provided for <br /> customer seeking to use both the bas and market services . <br /> 7 . Whether the combustible nature of the project will meet fire <br /> and safety standards.' <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Letourneau, Marks, Bowerman, Johnson, Rymarchick <br /> Nay: None <br /> Abstention: Cowan and Hiebel <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Several`.members of the Board felt they needed further direction from <br /> the Council as to what action is expected of them in dealing with <br /> similar cases should they arise before the new zoning ordinance is <br /> adopted. <br /> The Board noted the letter from American 'Monarch which verified <br /> the company' s purpose of purchasing the land west of their present <br /> plant for expansion purposes only. <br /> Motion by Mn:i" .Marks, seconded by Mr. Hiebel to adjourn the meeting at <br /> • 9: 30 P.M. for further consideration -of the new zoning ordinance. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Helen Crowe, Secy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.