My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 08311976
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1976
>
PL MINUTES 08311976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:19:18 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:19:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 08311976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> August 31, 1976 <br /> /William Bowerman, Chairman, opened the Public Hearing at 7 : 35 P.M. on <br /> the Planned Unit Development for Lots 9 thru 16, Block 6, Mounds View <br /> Acres which,.would include a dental clinic, a beauty salon, a retirement <br /> apartment building, a Country Kitchen restaurant along Silver Lake Road <br /> and a row of single family residences on Penrod Lane. <br /> Present for roll call: Cowan, Marks, Bowerman, Johnson and Rymarchick. <br /> Absent: Hiebel <br /> Also present Jim Fornell, Adm. Asst. <br /> There were also approximately 35 interested residents in attendance. <br /> Mr. Hedlund addressed the group announcing that he had learned just that <br /> day that government funding would be awarded to a Columbia Heights re- <br /> tirement home instead of to the First American Enterprises who had been <br /> granted a conditional use permit to erect a retirement apartment building <br /> • on a portion of the property in the proposed P.U.D. <br /> The developer then requested that another Public Hearing to scheduled to <br /> consider rezoning the west 187 feet of Lot 10 , Block 6, Mounds View Acres <br /> to allow Jim Hughes to remodel the existing building on that lot for a <br /> Gold Tiara beauty shop. He said Country Kitchen no longer planned to <br /> build on his property. <br /> Mr. Bowerman informed the developer that the Public Hearing had to be <br /> confined to the consideration of the proposed P.U.D. and his request could <br /> not be considered until after the hearing was officially closed. <br /> Mr. Hedlund then withdrew his application for a P.U.D. <br /> Several residents voiced their objections to the P.U.D. as had been pro- <br /> posed. One wanted to know why City officials continued to entertain re- <br /> quests for a Country Kitchen restaurant which they had previously rejected <br /> for the same area because of possible traffic generation, noise and odor <br /> pollution, opposition from the neighborhood and other undersirable charac- <br /> teristics. Another, Mrs. Ruth Nelson, 3916 Macalaster Drive, expressed <br /> he disappointment at the establishment of the Planned Unit Development <br /> concept as a land development vehicle. Duane Standing, 3817 Macalaster <br /> Drive, did not consider Mr. Hedlund 's proposal a valid P.U.D. , saying he <br /> felt it stretched the concept of a P.U.D. as a unified project which is <br /> allowed to give the developer flexibility for a creative use of his land. <br /> • He saw Hedlund 's proposal as more of a strip development. He also question- <br /> ed whether the proportion of commercial in the plan did not exceed the <br /> ratio of 30% which had been established for a P.U.D. in the new zoning <br /> ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.