My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 09191976
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1976
>
PL MINUTES 09191976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:19:23 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:19:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 09191976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ST. ANTHONY <br /> PLANNING BOARD MINUTES <br /> October 19 , 1976 <br /> Lacking a quorum, the Planning Board members present (Hiebel, Cowan, <br /> Rymarchick-) discussed signs and sign regulations with Jack Lawrence <br /> of Signcrafters, Inc, Mr. Lawrence spoke of a trend in the sign in- <br /> dustry towards more self regulation and argued the advantages of <br /> moderate sized, tastefully done, free-standing signs over excessive <br /> sign area on buildings . Numerous questions were raised by the Board <br /> members present about sign visibility , specifications, and regulations . <br /> It was suggested that other speakers could be invited to give other <br /> .perspectives. Mr. Marks arrived at 8 :10 P.M. and the discussion con- <br /> tinued. <br /> The October 19th Planning Board meeting was called to order by Vice <br /> Chairman Hiebel at 9 :01 P.M. <br /> Present at roll call: Cowan, Rymarchick, Marks and Hiebel <br /> Absent: Johnson, Letourneau, Bowerman <br /> Also present: Jim Fornell, Administrative Assistant <br /> I <br /> Motion by Rymarchick seconded by Hiebel to approve the September 21, i <br /> 1976 Planning Board minutes with the following correction: <br /> Paragraph 2 , Page 5 , -"look" not "lood" <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> i <br /> /The Board discussed the letter from Larry Vickrey concerning adminis- <br /> trative and legislative procedures for reviewing requests for land <br /> use changes. <br /> Mr. Cowan felt that a tightening of the procedures is probably warrant- <br /> ed and cited Mr. Hedlund's P.U.D. application and its lack of conform- <br /> ance with the submission requirements . He felt that the staff should <br /> probably have cancelled the hearing because the proper comprehensive <br /> information was not submitted. <br /> Mr. Fornell responded that he had talked with Mr. Hedlund about the re- <br /> quirements at least three times and would not feel comfortable making <br /> a determination whether the information submitted is not complete <br /> enough to warrant cancelling or postponing a public hearing. <br /> George Marks felt that a procedures booklet should be drafted to assist <br /> Planning Board members , especially new ones, and volunteered his services <br /> to prepare one. The Board thought it a good idea and encouraged him to <br /> work with City staff. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.