My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 11161976
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1976
>
PL MINUTES 11161976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:19:26 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:19:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 11161976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i� <br /> • allowed around the building wondering whether the park planners had <br /> abandoned their efforts to provide the landscaping originally agreed <br /> to. Petr. Hiebel said he saw "only a concrete building in a sea of <br /> blacktop" . Both agreed that the building was too tight a fit for <br /> the lot especially because of its central location' in the park where <br /> the project sould be more attractive. It was felt an overuse of the <br /> land could hinder development of adjacent properties. <br /> Mr. Hiebel also questioned whether the John Deere, Inc. business with <br /> a showroom fit into the office park concept of the development, say- <br /> ing he did not see the park as a high traffic area. Mr. Fornell <br /> said the proposal could be allowed with a liberal intrepretation of <br /> usages permitted under the zoning ordinance. Mr. Johnson said he <br /> liked the truck bay design and felt the backside of the building was <br /> more attractive than the front. <br /> Saying he would be very uncomfortable granting a building permit for <br /> a proposal with so few specifics, Mr. Hiebel said he would move for <br /> recommendation of disapproval of the building permit based on a need <br /> for more specific building, landscaping, elevation, lighting and <br /> signing plans as well as a desire for more relaxed parking plans . <br /> Before a second was obtained, Mr. Nielsen withdrew his request asking <br /> for more time to work the plans over in an effort to incorporate the <br /> Board's suggestions into a mroe acceptable proposal. <br /> r. Hiebel then withdrew his motion. <br /> Mr. Fornellf s memo of November 12th regarding Mr. Joe Sroga9 s plans <br /> to improve the appearance of his Standard Station at 3201 Stinson <br /> Boulevard was discussed with Por. Sroga after Mr. Hiebel explained <br /> how the Board' s reauest for such information had resulted from atten- <br /> tion which had been focused on that neia_hborhood when the Board was <br /> considering the proposal for rebuilding the Jiffy Market a block away. <br /> Mr. Sroga said he did not want to completely enclose the area in <br /> which the City's impounded or abandoned cars are stored because he <br /> wanted to be able to see that area from his home at 3204 Roosevelt <br /> Street N.E. for security reasons. He defended erecting an opaque <br /> slot cyclone fence rather than a wood fence comparing the maintenance <br /> costs of each and pointing out the successfuly use of such a fence <br /> for ten years by the Clark station down the street. <br /> He said he would be willing to donate the land to the south, which he <br /> has cleaned up, for use as a mini park if the City is willing to <br /> take over its maintenance. <br /> Mr. Sroga also said only the farthest east end of the City 's sewer <br /> easement would be affected by the erection of the fence. He also <br /> mentioned the good relations he enjoyed with his neighbors attributing <br /> (2) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.