Laserfiche WebLink
-2- <br /> resistance on the part of Realty World to further change their logo <br /> since concessions .had already been made to him regarding the lighting <br /> for the sign. <br /> Mr. .Jones arrived at 7: 40 P.M. and Mrs . Makowske at 7 :45 P.M. during <br /> this discussion. <br /> Mr. Enrooth questioned .whether the precedent set for Twin City Federal <br /> should be a matter of concern .in -this instance especially in view <br /> of the fact that Twin City, Federal 's -sign` s�.total height is less <br /> than proposed .here and theirs .is -a "monument" type sign. He :also <br /> pointed out the .Goodyear .sign which the City had insisted be cut <br /> down in size before approval ,and which is also monument rather than <br /> a freestanding sign;. Mr. Sopcinski .to.ld Mr. Cadwallader the City <br /> had in the past alway,s .sought a balance between the size of the sign <br /> and the building .it identifies and in this case saw the proposed <br /> signage as "really out of proportion" . <br /> Mr. Cadwallader suggested that .instead of tabling the matter, the <br /> Commission make .-"some sort of recommendation to .which the Council <br /> may react, rather than .delay. the..matter for another month" . <br /> Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded. by Mr. ..Enrooth to recommend Council <br /> approval of signage for the building .at 3901 Silver Lake Road which <br /> will result in .a "monument" type .of sign not to exceed 6 1/2 feet <br /> • in height from the top of .the existing berm, with._"monument" defined <br /> as "a sign mounted on a .fiill scale base with no .visibility between <br /> the bottom of the- ..sign and the base on which it is anchored which <br /> base can be larger than the sign itself" . There must be no overhead <br /> suspension of the sign itself. In recommending -approval the Com— <br /> mission finds -that: <br /> . <br /> (1) The signage as- described -will not be detrimental to the <br /> public welfare or injurious .to other 'property in the neighborhood <br /> or the City since its .size will. not differ substantially from <br /> the existing signage it replaces. <br /> (2) 'Not granting the signage may result in a hardship for the <br /> applicant since .better .visibility of the sign is needed so traffic <br /> proceeding north .along Silver Lake Road .will be able. to recognize <br /> the realty office in time to make the turn on 39th Avenue rather <br /> than having to .come back on .the. residential street, Penrod Lane, <br /> having missed the turn. the first time. <br /> (3) The signage will .conform to that for other properties in <br /> the surrounding area. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Ed .Brown, 2702-33rd Avenue .N.E..,_ .,was present to seek concept approval <br /> of his proposal to develop .the three back yards of his property <br /> • and those of his neighbors, David Taylor and Mrs . Thomas Clark, <br /> 2700 and 2608 - 33rd Avenue N.E. , _into two buildable lots of 75x131 .25 <br /> each to be sold for single family dwellings . Variances for lot <br /> size will be necessary since this division will result in the lots <br />