Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br /> Mr. Fornell left the meeting at 9 :40 P.M. <br /> The proposal had beengiven concept approval in February before it <br /> had been definitely determined that Ramsey County had acquired an <br /> additional right of way of ten feet for its rebuilding program for <br /> that road. Mr. Johnson had modified the size of- the buildings to <br /> accommodate this acquisition but now requires a three foot setback <br /> variance along 37th. It was also noted -by Mr.. Berg, because .a <br /> survey has not been submitted, the risk and responsibility as to the <br /> accuracy of the plans as submitted rests with• the. developer whose <br /> permit could be voided if a 'survey later shows inaccuracies in the <br /> plans. <br /> Mr. Johnson assured Mr_:- Bjorklund that "adequate drainage will be <br /> provided 'so neighboring properties will not be adversely affected <br /> and he promised- a determination will be made by soil borings as <br /> to how much fill will be necessary to make the site buildable. <br /> The Public Hearing was closed at 9 :51 P.M. <br /> Mr. Enrooth returned at 9 :52 P.M. <br /> Motion by Mr. Jones and seconded by..Mr. Peterson to recommend <br /> Council approval of a three foot side yard setback variance (from <br /> 30 foot required to 27 feet proposedl at the 37th -Avenue frontage of . <br /> • Lots 61, 62 , 63 and 65, Block 9 , Moundsview Acres Second Addition. <br /> This variance is necessitated by the ten foot right of way. recently <br /> acquired by Ramsey County for their proposed roadway. Also, the <br /> variance request is not prompted by desire to increase the value of <br /> the property since the developer has reduced the number of units to <br /> be developed from the possible permitted eight to seven. The <br /> developer agrees to provide- adequate .drainage for the property so <br /> the development will not have an. adverse effect on the adjoining <br /> property and further agrees to provide a survey- of the site which <br /> will address any existing utility easements as well as possible <br /> encroachment of a building to the west. As a condition for granting <br /> the variance, the developer further .agrees to prepare the subsoil <br /> so as to prevent settlement in the future and will submit a land- <br /> scaping plan that conforms to the R-3 zoning .requirements of the City <br /> ordinance. In addition to the variance, the Commission recommends <br /> a conditional use permit be granted to the petitioner which will permit <br /> the construction of seven unit townhouses as proposed finding that <br /> under such a permit, individual home ownership may be allowed and <br /> as such, a permit meets the guidelines established for the property <br /> in the proposed City Comprehensive Plan and for the same reasons <br /> heretofor stipulated for granting the variance petition. <br /> Motion carried unanimously. <br /> • <br />