PL MINUTES 10211980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-5- Motion by Mr. Sopcinski and seconded by Mrs.. Makowske to recommend Council approval. of that portion of the Hedlund PUD known as 3909 Silver Lake Road, described .as Lot ll,.. Block 1., Penrod. Addition, to be- developed as a barber-beauty shop in accordance. with the, site and elevation -drawings (as recorded by the Chairman):- with the following being accomplished: (1) An agreement that Mr: HedlunW s remaining undeveloped property in the Hedlund PUD cannot be further divided, i,.e.., all remain- ining property must be developed as a unit. This must be done in a legal and recorded document. (.2) All signage, landscaping, parking, street entries, etc.. requirements addressed in the PUD shall remain the, criteria for the undeveloped land and this property (.3909 Silver Lake Road) also in a legal and recorded document. (3) The structure on the property at 3909 Silver Lake Road may be altered, if required, to those standards for the PUD or greater. . (4) Final landscaping must be submitted �.to the City for approval. The Commission.' s recommendation is based upon the following findings : (a) the proposal conforms to the general PUD requirements regarding landscaping, parking, signage, etc. , • (b) the previous inability of the developer to proceed with a feasible plan for this site, and, (c) previous development plans submitted for the undeveloped portion of the Hedlund property have excluded the property at 3909 Silver Lake Road. The Commission further recommends that, since a $24,000 unconditional irrevocable Letter of Credit is required for the entire PUD before a building permit can be issued, and since this property represents 2/15 of the total PUD property, the granting of a building permit for! 3909 Silver Lake Road- shall require .a $3 ,200 Letter of Credit. The amended motion carried unanimously. At 10: 12 P.M. the public hearing- regarding the rezoning petition for the property at 2550 Kenzie Terrace was opened by Chairman Bjorklund who read the notice -of the hearing which had gone out to all property owners within 350 feet of the property petitioned to be rezoned. No one present reported failure to receive the notice or objected to its contents . The owner of the property, Max Saliterman, had requested the. City to rezone the parcel from a single family classi- fication to a "C" which better reflects its usage for the last 20 years. Mr. Berg informed the Commission that - property has been used many .years as a "C" use and as such has acquired a legal non- conforming use status. He recommended this status be retained which