My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PL MINUTES 04211981
StAnthony
>
Parks & Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Minutes
>
1981
>
PL MINUTES 04211981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/30/2015 3:22:55 PM
Creation date
12/30/2015 3:22:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
SP Box #
15
SP Name
PL MINUTES 04211981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-5- <br /> the use. of land devoted to parking" and on the same page., Mr. Sopcinski <br /> suggested A2-2 should . read "improve pedestrian access between land <br /> • uses to encourage more one stop parking" . <br /> Mr. Krier recommended the Commission only accept the goals and objectives <br /> and the land use plan at .this time and -not tie down a developer to <br /> specifics of the illustrated plan which had been presented but rather <br /> leave those options open as standards. for guidance and direction for <br /> the developers. <br /> Motion by Mr. Peterson and seconded. by Mr. Sopcinski:.to indicate to <br /> the Council that .the Planning Commission- has reviewed. the proposed <br /> goals and ..objectives. and land .use plan- developed by the. Kenzie Terrace <br /> Task Force and have given .the Task Force the benefit of their indi <br /> vidual reactions to the plan as recorded in .the minutes. It is the <br /> general consensus of. the Commission. -that these goals and objectives <br /> and the land use .plan- as presented, are .reasonable and warrant <br /> approval in principal since the Commission finds . there has been <br /> adequate consultation with the professional planners as well as with . <br /> City residents and businessmen of .the community involved .in the plan- <br /> ning process and the plan .is in .conformance with the Comprehensive <br /> Plan developed for St. Anthony. <br /> Voting on the motion: <br /> Aye: Peterson, Sopcinski , Jones, Bowerman, Enrooth and Makowske. <br /> • Abstention: . Bjorklund (:had performed as consultant for Westwood at <br /> one time) . <br /> Motion carried. <br /> No one was ..present to. discuss the. requested concept review of the <br /> proposed variance to permit an addition .to .the existing Danelski <br /> residence at 3301 Croft Drive, for an addition which would ,incorpor- <br /> ate solar heating. Mr. Berg had addressed the request in his memorandum <br /> of April 16th and answered further questions regarding the proposal. <br /> Mr. Jones left the meeting at 10 :25 P.M. <br /> Mr. Sopcinski agreed the-,addition- might be better located behind- the <br /> house because itmight be a hazard to traffic on Croft Road. Mr. <br /> Bowerman suggested the request not be considered because of insuf- <br /> ficient information which drew the approval of Mr. Peterson, Mrs. <br /> Makowske, .Chairman Bjorklund, and :Mr. Sopcinski with abstention by. <br /> Mr. Enrooth. <br /> Mrs . Makowske explained some of her concerns regarding the control <br /> the City will. have over the programming for Cable- T.V. if it becomes <br /> a joint effort with other communities . Mr. Berg was encouraged to <br /> attend the next Cable T.V. meeting to discuss these concerns with <br /> the Committee. <br /> The Metro Council Guidelines for Reviewing Local Comprehensive Plan _ <br /> Amendments were noted and Mr. Berg was thanked for his comments on <br /> the Housing Performance sections. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.